Timeline for Invariant symmetric bilinear forms and H^4 of BG
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2010 at 20:33 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | I agree. I thought it might be helpful to phrase it as a quasi-iso of DGAs since Kevin has mentioned DGAs in previous MO questions/answers, if I recall correctly. | |
| Oct 20, 2010 at 18:31 | comment | added | Johannes Ebert | Guillemin-Sternbergs "Equivariant de Rham theory" is another source. As far as I understand, the theory reduces to Chern-Weil theory if X is a point. | |
| Oct 19, 2010 at 21:47 | history | edited | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 214 characters in body
|
| Oct 19, 2010 at 21:44 | comment | added | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | I learnt this from a paper of Atiyah and Bott: The moment map and equivariant cohomology. You can get the PDF for free here: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/… | |
| Oct 19, 2010 at 21:34 | comment | added | Kevin H. Lin | Or: Where can I look them up? | |
| Oct 19, 2010 at 21:34 | comment | added | Kevin H. Lin | Sorry, but I am stupid: What are the Weil and Cartan models, exactly? | |
| Oct 19, 2010 at 18:32 | history | answered | José Figueroa-O'Farrill | CC BY-SA 2.5 |