Skip to main content
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
added 13 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\sqrt{n}\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in BellecTheorem 7.1, Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\sqrt{n}\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\sqrt{n}\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Theorem 7.1, Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

added 8 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\|\delta\|_2}. $$$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\sqrt{n}\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\sqrt{n}\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

added 5 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be sub-optimal in general.

Let $n,d,s$ be positive integers with $s \le d$, and let $B_0(d,s)$ be the set of all (real) $d$-dimensional vectors with at most $s$ nonzero components. Given an $n \times d$ matrix $X$ with rows $x_1,\ldots,x_n$, a vector $w_\star \in \mathbb R^d$, and iid $\epsilon_1,\ldots,\epsilon_n \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, form labels

$$ y_i := x_i^\top w + \epsilon,\text{ for }i=1,2,\ldots,n, $$

and consider a dataset $D_n := \{(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_n,y_n)\}$. Note that $D_n$ is random due to randomness in the $\epsilon_i$'s. The goal is to estimate $w_\star$ from the dataset $D_n$. Let $\hat A$ be any algorithm which consumes this dataset an outputs a possible random vector $\hat w_n := \hat A(D_n) \in \mathbb R^d$. Finally, let $\alpha \ge 0$ and $q \ge 1$, and define

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) := \inf_{\hat A}\sup_{w_\star \in B_0(d,s)}\mathbb E\,\alpha \|\hat w_n - w_\star\|_2 + \|\hat w_n-w_\star\|_q. $$

Question. What is a good lower-bound for $\Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X)$ ?

I'm particularly interested in the case $q=1$.

Very rough estimate

Define $\theta(X,s) \ge 0$ by

$$ \theta(X,s) := \sup_{\delta \in B_0(d,s),\,\delta \ne 0} \frac{\|X\delta\|_2}{\|\delta\|_2}. $$

It was shown in Bellec et al. 2018 that if $s \le d/2$, then

$$ \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X) \gtrsim \frac{\psi(n,d,s,q)}{\theta(X,1)},\text{ with }\psi(n,d,s,q) := \sigma s^{1/q}\sqrt{\dfrac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}. $$ We deduce that

$$ \begin{split} \Delta(n,d,s,q,\alpha,X) &\ge \max(\alpha\Delta(n,d,s,2,0,X), \Delta(n,d,s,q,0,X))\\ & \gtrsim \frac{\max(\alpha\psi(n,d,s,2),\psi(n,d,s,q))}{\theta(X,1)}\\ &\asymp \frac{\sigma}{\theta(X,1)}\sqrt{\frac{\log(ed/s)}{n}}\cdot \begin{cases} \alpha \sqrt{s},&\mbox{ if }\alpha = \Omega(1),\\ s^{1/q},&\mbox{ else.} \end{cases} \end{split} $$

However, by construction, the dependence on $\alpha$ and $q$ in the above is likely to be very sub-optimal in general.

deleted 8 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76
Loading
added 11 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76
Loading
added 10 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76
Loading
added 30 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76
Loading
added 123 characters in body
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76
Loading
Source Link
dohmatob
  • 6.9k
  • 1
  • 18
  • 76
Loading