Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 27, 2023 at 7:48 comment added Ryan Mickler The culmination of this work, in which Per and I prove some new cases of the Stanley conjecture, is now out: arxiv.org/abs/2309.13870
Jun 21, 2023 at 2:20 comment added Ryan Mickler The OP was asked in relation to some new results which have been finally made available here: arxiv.org/abs/2306.11115. In this paper, a relation involving the Jack Littlewood-Richardson coefficients of the following form is shown $\sum_{\gamma \supset \mu \cup \nu} c_{\mu\nu}^{\gamma}(\alpha) f_{\gamma,\mu,\nu}(u) = g_{\mu,\nu}(u)$, where $f_{\gamma,\mu,\nu}(u)$ and $g_{\mu,\nu}(u)$ are explict rational functions in a variable $u$.
Aug 1, 2022 at 19:29 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Name of HW reference
Aug 1, 2022 at 18:48 answer added Igor Pak timeline score: 4
Jul 31, 2022 at 0:55 comment added Richard Stanley For a mild generalization of the Harris-Willenbring identity, see Problem 92(d) at math.mit.edu/~rstan/ec/ch7supp.pdf. Problem 91 also has some identities involving $c^\lambda_{\mu\nu}$ together with $f^\lambda$, $f^\mu$, and $f^\nu$.
Jul 30, 2022 at 21:01 comment added darij grinberg For another example: arxiv.org/abs/2008.06128
Jul 30, 2022 at 19:47 comment added Sam Hopkins There are other identities involving LR coefficients which follow from exceptional equalities among skew Schur functions (see e.g. arxiv.org/abs/math/0602634) or sums of products of pairs of Schur functions (see e.g. arxiv.org/abs/math/0004113), but these are of a different flavor.
Jul 30, 2022 at 19:37 comment added Sam Hopkins You can take the definition of the LR coefficients $s_{\mu}(x_1,\ldots) s_{\nu}(x_1,\ldots) = \sum_{\lambda} c^{\lambda}_{\mu, \nu} s_{\lambda}(x_1,\ldots)$ and do any of the several nice specializations of Schur functions to get such an identity.
Jul 30, 2022 at 19:33 history asked Per Alexandersson CC BY-SA 4.0