Skip to main content
smoother phrasing and notation
Source Link
user44143
user44143

I am trying tolooking for an upper bound on the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |a_i-a_j|),\delta)}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the points in the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following conditionwhere (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (the $\epsilon^{-a}$ will most likely show up too but I hope to have $a>0$ be small as possible ). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

Specifically, I want a bound of the form $c^{n}\delta^{kn}, c,k>0$ (and if there are terms like $\epsilon^{-a}$, I hope to have $a>0$ be small as possible). I hope to avoid bounds with factorials like $n! c^{n}\delta^{kn}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) camearose because the original integral contains

$$\int E[\prod_{i\geq 1} (e^{U(a_{i})}-1)] \prod_i da_i,$$$$\int E\left[\prod_{i\geq 1} (e^{U(a_{i})}-1)\right]\prod_i da_i,$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |t-s|),\delta)})$$R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln\left(\frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |t-s|),\delta)}\right)$.

TheOne reasonable approach is to use the derivations for the Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integral. The issueHowever I come across isan issue in trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering themthe coordinates

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And soThen the (*) conditionscondition forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, a_j-a_1),\delta)}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

ItThis is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads$n$ beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use the Vieta-formula formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number of singular terms.

I am trying to upper bound the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |a_i-a_j|),\delta)}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following condition (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (the $\epsilon^{-a}$ will most likely show up too but I hope to have $a>0$ be small as possible ). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) came because the original integral contains

$$\int E[\prod_{i\geq 1} (e^{U(a_{i})}-1)] \prod_i da_i,$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |t-s|),\delta)})$.

The reasonable approach is to use the derivations for Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integral. The issue I come across is trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering them

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And so the (*) conditions forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, a_j-a_1),\delta)}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

It is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use Vieta-formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number singular terms.

I am looking for an upper bound on the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |a_i-a_j|),\delta)}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the points in the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ where (*) each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Specifically, I want a bound of the form $c^{n}\delta^{kn}, c,k>0$ (and if there are terms like $\epsilon^{-a}$, I hope to have $a>0$ be small as possible). I hope to avoid bounds with factorials like $n! c^{n}\delta^{kn}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) arose because the original integral contains

$$\int E\left[\prod_{i\geq 1} (e^{U(a_{i})}-1)\right]\prod_i da_i,$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln\left(\frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |t-s|),\delta)}\right)$.

One reasonable approach is to use the derivations for the Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integral. However I come across an issue in trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering the coordinates

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

Then the (*) condition forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, a_j-a_1),\delta)}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

This is also reminiscent of the first approach here of $n$ beads on a circle but further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use the Vieta formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number of singular terms.

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Thomas Kojar
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 19
  • 41

I am trying to upper bound the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee |a_i-a_j|\wedge\delta}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |a_i-a_j|),\delta)}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following condition (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (I hope thethe $\epsilon$$\epsilon^{-a}$ will notmost likely show up for sometoo but I hope to have $a>0$ be small enough exponentas possible $b$). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) came because the original integral contains

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1],$$$$\int E[\prod_{i\geq 1} (e^{U(a_{i})}-1)] \prod_i da_i,$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\epsilon \wedge |t-s|\vee \delta})$$R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |t-s|),\delta)})$.

The reasonable approach is to use the derivations for Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integralsintegral. The issue I come across is trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering them

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And so the (*) conditions forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee (a_j-a_1)\wedge \delta}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, a_j-a_1),\delta)}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

It is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use Vieta-formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number singular terms.

I am trying to upper bound the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee |a_i-a_j|\wedge\delta}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following condition (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (I hope the $\epsilon$ will not show up for some small enough exponent $b$). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) came because the original integral contains

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1],$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\epsilon \wedge |t-s|\vee \delta})$.

The reasonable approach is to use the derivations for Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integrals. The issue I come across is trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering them

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And so the (*) conditions forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee (a_j-a_1)\wedge \delta}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

It is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use Vieta-formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number singular terms.

I am trying to upper bound the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |a_i-a_j|),\delta)}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following condition (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (the $\epsilon^{-a}$ will most likely show up too but I hope to have $a>0$ be small as possible ). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) came because the original integral contains

$$\int E[\prod_{i\geq 1} (e^{U(a_{i})}-1)] \prod_i da_i,$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, |t-s|),\delta)})$.

The reasonable approach is to use the derivations for Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integral. The issue I come across is trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering them

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And so the (*) conditions forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\min (\max(\epsilon, a_j-a_1),\delta)}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

It is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use Vieta-formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number singular terms.

edited body
Source Link
Thomas Kojar
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 19
  • 41

I am trying to upper bound the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee |a_i-a_j|\wedge\delta}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following condition (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (I hope the $\epsilon$ will not show up for some small enough exponent $b$). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) came because the original integral contains

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1],$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\epsilon \vee |t-s|\wedge \delta})$$R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\epsilon \wedge |t-s|\vee \delta})$.

The reasonable approach is to use the derivations for Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integrals. The issue I come across is trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering them

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And so the (*) conditions forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\wedge (a_j-a_1)\vee \delta}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee (a_j-a_1)\wedge \delta}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

It is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use Vieta-formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number singular terms.

I am trying to upper bound the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee |a_i-a_j|\wedge\delta}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following condition (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (I hope the $\epsilon$ will not show up for some small enough exponent $b$). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) came because the original integral contains

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1],$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\epsilon \vee |t-s|\wedge \delta})$.

The reasonable approach is to use the derivations for Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integrals. The issue I come across is trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering them

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And so the (*) conditions forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\wedge (a_j-a_1)\vee \delta}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

It is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use Vieta-formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number singular terms.

I am trying to upper bound the following integral:

$$\int_{X_{\delta}}\prod_{j\neq i=1}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee |a_i-a_j|\wedge\delta}\right )^{b} \prod_{i=1}^{n} da_{i},$$

where $0<\epsilon<\delta<1$, $0<b<1$ and the set $X_{\delta}$ is the hypercube $[0,1]^{n}$ but with the following condition (*): each $a_i$ is $\delta$-close to at least one other $a_j$ i.e. $|a_i-a_j|<\delta$.

Q: The hope is to get a bound of the form $c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}, c_{1},c_{2}>0$ (I hope the $\epsilon$ will not show up for some small enough exponent $b$). Also I hope to avoid having bound with factorial i.e. $n! c_{1}^{n}\delta^{c_{2}n}$. Any suggestions are welcome.

PS: The condition (*) came because the original integral contains

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1],$$

where $U(a_{i})$ are normalized Gaussians i.e. $E[e^{U(a_{i})}]=1$ and with short-range correlation $R(s,t)=E[U(s)U(t)]=b\ln(\frac{\delta}{\epsilon \wedge |t-s|\vee \delta})$.

The reasonable approach is to use the derivations for Selberg/Dirichlet/Dixon-Anderson integrals. The issue I come across is trying to handle the (*)-condition. For example, one can start by ordering them

$$a_{1}<a_{2}<...<a_{n}<1.$$

And so the (*) conditions forces that $a_{2}-a_{1}<\delta$ and $a_{n}-a_{n-1}<\delta$. So the reasonable thing is to start from the inner integral

$$\int_{(a_{2}-\delta) \vee 0}^{a_{2}}\prod_{j\geq 2}^{n}\left ( \frac{\delta}{\epsilon\vee (a_j-a_1)\wedge \delta}\right )^{b} da_{1}$$

It is also reminiscent of the first approach here of n-beads on a circle but now further imposing short-range correlation as opposed to long-range.

Moreover, starting from the Gaussian product one can use Vieta-formula

$$E[\prod_{i\geq 1} e^{U(a_{i})}-1]=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}(-1)^{\ell}\sum_{S\subset [n], |S|=\ell}\exp\{\sum_{i, r\in S}R(a_i,a_r)\}, $$

which reduces the number singular terms.

edited title
Link
Thomas Kojar
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 19
  • 41
Loading
Source Link
Thomas Kojar
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 19
  • 41
Loading