Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link

It is not. It is very important, very awful, and quite intended that the membership relation between the same two types is the same in different sequences foof types.

It is not. It is very important, very awful, and quite intended that the membership relation between the same two types is the same in different sequences fo types.

It is not. It is very important, very awful, and quite intended that the membership relation between the same two types is the same in different sequences of types.

Source Link

It is not. It is very important, very awful, and quite intended that the membership relation between the same two types is the same in different sequences fo types.