Skip to main content
added 319 characters in body
Source Link
varkor
  • 10.7k
  • 29
  • 72

The first question is the main topic of Reggio'stwo recent paper Polyadic Sets and Homomorphism Countingpapers:

As far as I understand, whichthe theorems give orthogonal sufficient conditions: it's unclear whether there is also a good reference for previous results in the literature (including that of Pultr mentioned in the comments). In particular, see Theorems 4.3, 5.10, and 5.12, the latter of which generalise beyond locally-finite categoriesgeneral theorem subsuming both.

I don't believe there are answers for enriched categories yet.

The first question is the main topic of Reggio's recent paper Polyadic Sets and Homomorphism Counting, which is also a good reference for previous results in the literature (including that of Pultr mentioned in the comments). In particular, see Theorems 4.3, 5.10, and 5.12, the latter of which generalise beyond locally-finite categories.

I don't believe there are answers for enriched categories yet.

The first question is the main topic of two recent papers:

As far as I understand, the theorems give orthogonal sufficient conditions: it's unclear whether there is a general theorem subsuming both.

I don't believe there are answers for enriched categories yet.

Source Link
varkor
  • 10.7k
  • 29
  • 72

The first question is the main topic of Reggio's recent paper Polyadic Sets and Homomorphism Counting, which is also a good reference for previous results in the literature (including that of Pultr mentioned in the comments). In particular, see Theorems 4.3, 5.10, and 5.12, the latter of which generalise beyond locally-finite categories.

I don't believe there are answers for enriched categories yet.