Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 12, 2022 at 8:21 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 176 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 7:54 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 365 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 7:48 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 365 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 7:23 comment added SSequence Also, I think it is probably reasonable to mention (very briefly) that you are talking about stabilization times with respect to first $\omega$ cells.
Jul 12, 2022 at 7:20 comment added SSequence "Can we continue the similar logic unboundedly and define the class $\mathsf{S}$ of ordinals $\sigma(\beta)$, where $\beta$ may be an arbitrarily large ordinal?" I don't see any reason why we can't do this. To see this the following simple observation would suffice. Whenever arbitrarily large ordinals in $\mathrm{Ord}$ aren't marked as $1$ in an oracle tape we are guaranteed that we can take the supremum of stabilization times above all the $1$'s on the oracle tape (on the very least). This is also why the values $\sigma(\alpha)$ would be strictly increasing w.r.t. ordinal $\alpha$.
Jul 12, 2022 at 6:08 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Jul 12, 2022 at 5:45 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 236 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 5:35 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 68 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 5:13 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 51 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 4:58 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 102 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 4:49 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 4:38 history edited lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0
added 281 characters in body
Jul 12, 2022 at 4:16 history asked lyrically wicked CC BY-SA 4.0