Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

Lowercase title
Source Link
LSpice
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

In CATEGORY OCategory $\mathcal O$: QUIVERS AND ENDOMORPHISM RINGS OF PROJECTIVESQuivers and endomorphism rings of projectives by Stroppel,5 5.11 (page 328-329pages 328–329), this quiver is described as $\rm{Rep}(\mathcal O_0(\mathfrak{sl}_2))$. The representation theory is well-understood (for example see Humphrey's book on category $\mathcal O$).

In CATEGORY O: QUIVERS AND ENDOMORPHISM RINGS OF PROJECTIVES by Stroppel,5.11 (page 328-329), this quiver is described as $\rm{Rep}(\mathcal O_0(\mathfrak{sl}_2))$. The representation theory is well-understood (for example see Humphrey's book on category $\mathcal O$).

In Category $\mathcal O$: Quivers and endomorphism rings of projectives by Stroppel, 5.11 (pages 328–329), this quiver is described as $\rm{Rep}(\mathcal O_0(\mathfrak{sl}_2))$. The representation theory is well-understood (for example see Humphrey's book on category $\mathcal O$).

Source Link
Nicolas Hemelsoet
Nicolas Hemelsoet
  • 769
  • 2
  • 6
  • 15

In CATEGORY O: QUIVERS AND ENDOMORPHISM RINGS OF PROJECTIVES by Stroppel,5.11 (page 328-329), this quiver is described as $\rm{Rep}(\mathcal O_0(\mathfrak{sl}_2))$. The representation theory is well-understood (for example see Humphrey's book on category $\mathcal O$).