Timeline for Independence and Category Theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2012 at 8:39 | history | undeleted | Harry Gindi | ||
| Feb 29, 2012 at 14:14 | history | deleted | Harry Gindi | ||
| Feb 29, 2012 at 14:06 | history | undeleted | Harry Gindi | ||
| Dec 1, 2010 at 13:43 | history | deleted | Harry Gindi | ||
| Oct 18, 2010 at 8:49 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 163 characters in body
|
| Oct 18, 2010 at 8:44 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 141 characters in body; added 175 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Oct 18, 2010 at 8:40 | comment | added | Not Mike | Yes, when a logician, and properly trained mathematician--that understands the care you need to take with these issues--gives me an answer I will be satisfied. | |
| Oct 18, 2010 at 8:37 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | You have a fundamental misunderstanding of category theory, as you demonstrated in our IRC exchange. I feel like the only way that you will be satisfied is if a logician explains to you why you're wrong. | |
| Oct 18, 2010 at 8:34 | comment | added | Not Mike | But you cannot quarantine this to just sets, this dependence on the axioms of set theory will spread to any category you can "map" Set into, Top, Grp, etc.. The independence of the very existence of a suslin line and whitehead group will guarantee that as soon as you pick a "value" for any of these limits, you have just changed the axioms of set theory you are currently working with. That is the problem, and I don't understand why this isn't handled with more care. Thus, you do not answer my question. | |
| Oct 18, 2010 at 7:39 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 178 characters in body
|
| Oct 18, 2010 at 7:32 | history | answered | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |