Timeline for Relationship between the TQFTs in Kapustin-Witten and Ben-Zvi-Sakellaridis-Venkatesh
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2022 at 21:54 | comment | added | Hollis Williams | @JulesLamers I have never seen anyone do that before, that seems highly unnecessary. | |
| Jun 24, 2022 at 3:34 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jun 24, 2022 at 2:11 | comment | added | David Ben-Zvi | The question of how to pass from a TQFT in the physics sense as in KW (here a twisted SUSY QFT, with a differential that makes variation of metric exact) to functorial extended TFT in the Atiyah-Segal-Lawrence-Freed-Baez-Dolan-Lurie-.. style is a good one but separate (the Kapustin ICM address is a good introduction from a physicist's POV). One useful inroad (though not the original one)is to consider not just partition functions but the collection of all defects of different dimensions and their interfaces. | |
| Jun 24, 2022 at 1:07 | vote | accept | Anton Hilado | ||
| Jun 23, 2022 at 21:30 | answer | added | David Ben-Zvi | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 21:23 | comment | added | Jules Lamers | This is a good illustration of why one should compound authors using an en-dash (Kapustin--Witten) and leave single dashes for compound names (Ben-Zvi) ;) | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 20:30 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 19:33 | history | asked | Anton Hilado | CC BY-SA 4.0 |