Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 31 at 9:31 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
Oct 18, 2010 at 23:55 comment added Thierry Zell @Hugh: You are absolutely right. I tried to temper my statement by writing "almost obvious", but in hindsight, even that wording was too strong.
Oct 18, 2010 at 22:25 comment added Hugh J I am not sure it is so intuitive, even in the nice $C^1$ case. For example, could you explain to a child why the results holds in the plane and not in the torus ?
Oct 17, 2010 at 22:52 comment added Thierry Zell The Jordan curve theorem is not intuitive: it deals with continuous curves, and at that level of generality it is quite legitimate to expect the worst. The result is almost obvious for $C^1$ curves, of course, but there is a chasm between $C^0$ and $C^1$, and I can think of a couple of "intuitive" results like this which are not yet even proved in the $C^0$ case. See e.g. the square pegs & round holes problem quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2007/08/31/… which may be close to being solved, but has been open since 1911!
Oct 17, 2010 at 19:01 comment added HJRW unknown - for suitable definitions of 'heuristic' and 'simple', yes, I do. But the key word in the question is 'disproportionate'.
Oct 17, 2010 at 18:12 comment added Qfwfq @Henry: but you admit it is a very "simple" fact from the heuristic view point? :)
Oct 17, 2010 at 17:40 comment added HJRW I think the idea of this question is to judge the simplicity of the fact by the length of the shortest possible elementary proof, not by the length of the statement.
Oct 17, 2010 at 17:03 comment added Qfwfq I don't know...It looks a very "intuitively simple fact", despite it's actual mathematical nontriviality. Maybe it's a bit offtopic w.r.t. the OP's question?
Oct 17, 2010 at 16:58 comment added Robin Chapman Is that a "simple fact"?
Oct 17, 2010 at 16:56 history answered Qfwfq CC BY-SA 2.5