Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 3
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13

Let $\alpha>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am rather interested in finding a sharp estimate for $I(\lambda)$ in terms of negative powers of $\lambda$ rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $\alpha=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $\psi$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{\alpha}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}} dt \psi(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/\alpha}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\psi(x)}{x^{1/\alpha}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

Let $\alpha>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am rather interested in a sharp estimate rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $\alpha=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $\psi$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{\alpha}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}} dt \psi(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/\alpha}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\psi(x)}{x^{1/\alpha}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

Let $\alpha>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am interested in finding a sharp estimate for $I(\lambda)$ in terms of negative powers of $\lambda$ rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $\alpha=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $\psi$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{\alpha}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}} dt \psi(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/\alpha}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\psi(x)}{x^{1/\alpha}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13

Let $a>1$$\alpha>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$$\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dtdx.$$$$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am rather interested in finding a sharp estimate for $I(\lambda)$ in terms of negative powers of $\lambda$ rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $a=k$$\alpha=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $f$$\psi$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{a}$$\phi(t,x):=x t^{\alpha}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dx.$$$$\int_{0}^{\infty} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda$$xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{a}}=1+O(\delta)$$e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{a}} dt f(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/a}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{f(x)}{x^{1/a}} dx.$$$${\int\int}_{xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}} dt \psi(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/\alpha}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\psi(x)}{x^{1/\alpha}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

Let $a>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am interested in finding a sharp estimate for $I(\lambda)$ in terms of negative powers of $\lambda$ rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $a=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $f$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{a}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{a}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{a}} dt f(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/a}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{f(x)}{x^{1/a}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

Let $\alpha>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am rather interested in a sharp estimate rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $\alpha=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $\psi$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{\alpha}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}} dt \psi(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/\alpha}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\psi(x)}{x^{1/\alpha}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

deleted 84 characters in body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.7k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

Let $\alpha>1$$a>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$$f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dtdx.$$$$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am interested in finding a sharp estimate for $I(\lambda)$ in terms of negative powers of $\lambda$ rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $\alpha=k$$a=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $\psi$$f$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{\alpha}$$\phi(t,x):=x t^{a}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dx.$$$$\int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda$$xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}}=1+O(\delta)$$e^{i \lambda xt^{a}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}} dt \psi(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/\alpha}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\psi(x)}{x^{1/\alpha}} dx.$$$${\int\int}_{xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{a}} dt f(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/a}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{f(x)}{x^{1/a}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

Let $\alpha>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $\psi:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am interested in finding a sharp estimate for $I(\lambda)$ in terms of negative powers of $\lambda$ rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $\alpha=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $\psi$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{\alpha}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \psi(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{\alpha}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{\alpha}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{\alpha}} dt \psi(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/\alpha}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\psi(x)}{x^{1/\alpha}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

Let $a>1$ not necessarily an integer, and let $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function with compact support. Consider the oscillatory integral $$I(\lambda):=\int_{0}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{1} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dtdx.$$

My question is about the asymptotic behavior of $I(\lambda)$ as $\lambda \to \infty$. I am interested in finding a sharp estimate for $I(\lambda)$ in terms of negative powers of $\lambda$ rather than the asymptotic expansion. But the latter is sometimes essential to obtain such an estimate.

A solution for a special case: If $a=k$ where $k$ is an integer, and $f$ is supported away from $x=0$, then the phase $\phi(t,x):=x t^{a}$ satisfies $\partial^{k}_{t}\phi>0$ and we have the estimate

$$\left|\int_{0}^{1} \,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dt\right|\leq \frac{C}{\lambda^{\frac{1}{k}}}.$$ From here we get $|I(\lambda)|=O(\lambda^{-1/k})$. But this is possibly not the best estimate for $I(\lambda)$, because we did not benefit from the oscillation (the cancellation) that comes from integration w.r.t the variable $x$.

Another approach is to interchange order of integration and look first at the oscillatory integral $$\int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)\,e^{\dot{\imath} \lambda x t^{a}}dx.$$ The problem with this approach is that the phase $x \to \phi(t,x)$ has degenerate stationary points on the line $t=0$.

Intuitively, when the phase is small enough, there is no oscillation. If $\delta<1$ is fixed and $xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda$ then $e^{i \lambda xt^{a}}=1+O(\delta)$. And we have the estimate

$${\int\int}_{xt^{a}<\delta/\lambda} e^{i \lambda xt^{a}} dt f(x)dx\geq \frac{C_{\delta}}{{\lambda}^{1/a}} \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{f(x)}{x^{1/a}} dx.$$ Nevertheless, there may be some interaction between this portion of $I(\lambda)$ and another portion.

edited tags
Link
Willie Wong
  • 38.9k
  • 4
  • 94
  • 176
Loading
added 59 characters in body
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13
Loading
Source Link
Medo
  • 852
  • 5
  • 13
Loading