Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 18, 2022 at 9:23 history edited MyShepherd CC BY-SA 4.0
added 320 characters in body
Jun 18, 2022 at 9:07 history edited MyShepherd CC BY-SA 4.0
added 163 characters in body
Jun 18, 2022 at 8:48 history edited MyShepherd CC BY-SA 4.0
added 35 characters in body
Jun 18, 2022 at 8:42 history edited MyShepherd CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1392 characters in body
Jun 18, 2022 at 8:29 comment added MyShepherd You can impose any constaint on $du$ in order to make the equation elliptic. Demanding it to be a gradient is equivelent to $du=0$. However, you could impose $du=F_{0}$ for any closed vector field $F_{0}$. I will elaborate on this in my answer above.
Jun 17, 2022 at 10:09 comment added mlainz Thank you for your suggestion. As I answered @WillieWong, requiring $u$ to be a gradient is too restrictive. A generalization of this condition is to require $\delta u = g$, that is, $\partial u / \partial x^i - \partial u/ \partial x_j = f_{ii}$, where $f_{ij} = - f_{ji}$. I could then try to study the operator $P$ augmented with the extra equations. Do you know if there in some sense in which this operator could be considered elliptic?
Jun 16, 2022 at 20:10 history answered MyShepherd CC BY-SA 4.0