Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 24, 2022 at 12:26 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
a minor typo
Oct 18, 2010 at 19:28 vote accept J Verma
Oct 18, 2010 at 12:24 answer added Zoran Skoda timeline score: 16
Oct 18, 2010 at 8:57 answer added Leo Alonso timeline score: 6
Oct 18, 2010 at 1:13 comment added Harry Gindi @Scott: Certainly, but I think it's been evident from the beginning that triangulated categories were not the canonical "right" notion.
Oct 18, 2010 at 0:33 comment added S. Carnahan I disagree with Harry's implicit statement that there is a unique "modern way" to approach derived categories. Also, I was under the impression that Hovey's book does not say much about coherent sheaves on projective varieties.
Oct 17, 2010 at 20:13 answer added Piotr Achinger timeline score: 3
Oct 17, 2010 at 16:58 comment added Shizhuo Zhang Hi,Verma,you might want to take Rosenberg's course now, it is of great help
Oct 17, 2010 at 13:52 answer added Arend Bayer timeline score: 13
Oct 17, 2010 at 13:39 comment added Harry Gindi If you want to learn about derived categories in the modern way, take a look at M. Hovey's Model Categories chapters 1 and 2 (don't worry, they're pretty short and not too bad a read, although you might want to skip the parts on the small object argument). After that, there are two ways you can go: The computationally more useful but substantially less natural approach of working with triangulated categories, or by working with simplicial localizations and resolutions.
Oct 17, 2010 at 13:29 history edited S. Carnahan CC BY-SA 2.5
changed title
Oct 17, 2010 at 13:11 history edited Dylan Thurston
edited tags
Oct 17, 2010 at 7:38 comment added Francesco Polizzi "Fourier-Mukai transforms in algebraic geometry" by D. Huybrechts
Oct 17, 2010 at 6:35 history asked J Verma CC BY-SA 2.5