Skip to main content
TeXed quote
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

In Lurie's "Higher topos theory" lemma.4 4.3.2.7

In Lurie's "Higher topos theory" lemma 4.3.2.7, I’m trying to understand “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$. enter image description here It:

Lemma 4.3.2.7. Suppose we are given a diagram of $\infty$-categories \xymatrix{ \calC^{0} \ar@{^{(}->}[d] \ar[r]^{F_0} & \calD \ar[d]^{p} \
\calC \ar[r] \ar[ur]^{F} & \calD' }

as in Definition 4.3.2.2, where $p$ is a categorical fibration and $F$ is a $p$-left Kan extension of $F_0$. Then the induced map $$\mathcal D_{F/} \to \mathcal D'_{p F/} \times_{\mathcal D'_{p F_0/}} \mathcal D_{F_0/}$$ is a trivial fibration of simplicial sets. In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.

It seems that here we have $C\rightarrow C*\mathrm{pt}$ is a homotopy pushout of right cone $C_0\rightarrow C_0*\mathrm{pt}$ via the embedding of quasi-categories $C_0\rightarrow C$, but why?

Or, is there another way to figure out “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.”?

In Lurie's "Higher topos theory" lemma.4.3.2.7

I’m trying to understand “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$. enter image description here It seems that here we have $C\rightarrow C*\mathrm{pt}$ is a homotopy pushout of right cone $C_0\rightarrow C_0*\mathrm{pt}$ via the embedding of quasi-categories $C_0\rightarrow C$, but why?

Or, is there another way to figure out “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.”?

In Lurie's "Higher topos theory" lemma 4.3.2.7

In Lurie's "Higher topos theory" lemma 4.3.2.7, I’m trying to understand “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$:

Lemma 4.3.2.7. Suppose we are given a diagram of $\infty$-categories \xymatrix{ \calC^{0} \ar@{^{(}->}[d] \ar[r]^{F_0} & \calD \ar[d]^{p} \
\calC \ar[r] \ar[ur]^{F} & \calD' }

as in Definition 4.3.2.2, where $p$ is a categorical fibration and $F$ is a $p$-left Kan extension of $F_0$. Then the induced map $$\mathcal D_{F/} \to \mathcal D'_{p F/} \times_{\mathcal D'_{p F_0/}} \mathcal D_{F_0/}$$ is a trivial fibration of simplicial sets. In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.

It seems that here we have $C\rightarrow C*\mathrm{pt}$ is a homotopy pushout of right cone $C_0\rightarrow C_0*\mathrm{pt}$ via the embedding of quasi-categories $C_0\rightarrow C$, but why?

Or, is there another way to figure out “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.”?

formatting
Source Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

HTT In Lurie's "Higher topos theory" lemma.4.3.2.7

I’m trying to understand “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.” enter image description here It seems that here we have $C\rightarrow C*pt$$C\rightarrow C*\mathrm{pt}$ is a homotopy pushout of right cone $C_0\rightarrow C_0*pt$$C_0\rightarrow C_0*\mathrm{pt}$ via the embedding of quasi-categories $C_0\rightarrow C$, but why?

Or, is there another way to figure out “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.”?

HTT lemma.4.3.2.7

I’m trying to understand “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.” enter image description here It seems that here we have $C\rightarrow C*pt$ is a homotopy pushout of right cone $C_0\rightarrow C_0*pt$ via the embedding of quasi-categories $C_0\rightarrow C$, but why?

Or, is there another way to figure out “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.”?

In Lurie's "Higher topos theory" lemma.4.3.2.7

I’m trying to understand “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.” enter image description here It seems that here we have $C\rightarrow C*\mathrm{pt}$ is a homotopy pushout of right cone $C_0\rightarrow C_0*\mathrm{pt}$ via the embedding of quasi-categories $C_0\rightarrow C$, but why?

Or, is there another way to figure out “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.”?

Source Link
XiaYu
  • 429
  • 2
  • 6

HTT lemma.4.3.2.7

I’m trying to understand “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.” enter image description here It seems that here we have $C\rightarrow C*pt$ is a homotopy pushout of right cone $C_0\rightarrow C_0*pt$ via the embedding of quasi-categories $C_0\rightarrow C$, but why?

Or, is there another way to figure out “In particular, we may identify $p$-colimits of $F$ with $p$-colimits of $F_0$.”?