Skip to main content
fixed a not so minor typo defining the change of time.
Source Link

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$.


Proof. Introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$$\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s = \sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s)$ together with the reflection symmetry of Brownian motion, i.e., $-W_s$ is also a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions. $\Box$


This proof also answers this MO question: Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$.


Proof. Introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s = \sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s)$ together with the reflection symmetry of Brownian motion, i.e., $-W_s$ is also a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions. $\Box$


This proof also answers this MO question: Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$.


Proof. Introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s = \sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s)$ together with the reflection symmetry of Brownian motion, i.e., $-W_s$ is also a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions. $\Box$


This proof also answers this MO question: Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

(i) separated the proof from the intro/conclusion; (ii) added more detail to a step in the proof and (iii) added more detail to conclusion
Source Link

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$. To see this, introduce


Proof. Introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s = \sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s)$ together with the reflection symmetry of Brownian motion, i.e., $-W_s$ is againalso a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*}\begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ &1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation}\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions. $\Box$


As a byproduct, \eqref{final_g} gives the formula requested inThis proof also answers this MO question: Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$. To see this, introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-W_s$ is again a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ &1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions.


As a byproduct, \eqref{final_g} gives the formula requested in Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$.


Proof. Introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s = \sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s)$ together with the reflection symmetry of Brownian motion, i.e., $-W_s$ is also a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ & \quad 1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions. $\Box$


This proof also answers this MO question: Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

tried to make some unwieldy displayed equations more readable
Source Link

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$. To see this, introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-W_s$ is again a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \\ &= 1 - \int_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} z^{-3/2} e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} dz \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g} \end{align*} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions. Here we used that\begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the first hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2 $$(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ &1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions.


As a byproduct, \eqref{final_g} gives the formula requested in Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$. To see this, introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-W_s$ is again a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \\ &= 1 - \int_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} z^{-3/2} e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} dz \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g} \end{align*} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions. Here we used that the distribution of the first hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2 $.


As a byproduct, \eqref{final_g} gives the formula requested in Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

Yes, $g(t)$ is differentiable with respect to $t$ under the assumption that $a(s) > 0 $ for $s \in [0,t]$. To see this, introduce the time-change $\tau(s) := \int_0^s a(u)^{-2} du$ and set $c(s) := b(\tau^{-1}(s)) a(\tau^{-1}(s))^{-2}$ for $s \in [0,t]$. In terms of this time change, the process $X_t$ can be written equivalently (in law) as $$ X_t \overset{d}{=} X_0 + \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(r) dr + W_{\tau(t)} \;. $$ By Girsanov's Theorem, \begin{align*} & g(t) = E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} \left( \int_0^s c(r) dr + W_s \right) \ge -X_0 ) \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\inf_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge -X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} (-W_s) \le X_0 ) e^{\left(\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \\ &= 1 - E\left[ 1(\sup_{0 \le s \le \tau(t)} W_s \ge X_0) e^{\left(-\int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{\tau(t)} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \end{align*} where in the last step we used that $-W_s$ is again a standard BM.

Let $T = \inf\{ t \ge 0 \mid W_t = X_0 \}$. By the strong Markov property of BM, \begin{equation} g(t) = 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{\left(-\int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^{T} c(s)^2 ds \right)} \right] \tag{1} \label{g_T} \end{equation} Moreover, since the process $\{ W_s \}_{s \in [0,T]}$ is a Brownian bridge from $(0,0)$ to $(T,X_0)$, we have $$ W_s = X_0 \frac{s}{T} + (T-s) \int_0^s \frac{1}{T-r} dB_r \;, $$ where $B$ is a standard BM. Hence, \begin{align*} \int_0^{T} c(s) dW_s = \frac{X_0}{T} \int_0^T c(s) ds + \int_0^T \left( c(s) - \frac{1}{T-s} \int_s^T c(r) dr \right) d B_s \end{align*} Inserting this into \eqref{g_T} yields, \begin{align*} &g(t) = \\ & 1 - E\left[ 1(T \le \tau(t)) e^{- \int\limits_0^{T} \left(-\frac{X_0}{T} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{T-s} \int\limits_s^T c_r dr)^2 \right) ds} \right] \end{align*} Since the distribution of the hitting time $T$ is inverse gamma with parameters $1/2$ and $(1/2) X_0^2$, \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} &g(t) = \\ &1 - \int\limits_0^{\tau(t)} \frac{X_0 e^{- \frac{X_0^2}{2 z}- \int\limits_0^{z} \left(-\frac{X_0}{z} c(s)-\frac{1}{2} c(s)^2 + \frac{1}{2} (c_s - \frac{1}{z-s} \int\limits_s^z c_r dr)^2 \right) ds}}{\sqrt{2 \pi} z^{3/2}} dz \end{aligned} \tag{$\star$} \label{final_g}\end{equation} which is differentiable with respect to $t$ without any additional assumptions.


As a byproduct, \eqref{final_g} gives the formula requested in Probability that a drifted Gaussian process does not hit zero

simplified an expression
Source Link
Loading
added 59 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 55 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 149 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
corrected some typos
Source Link
Loading
added 27 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 77 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Post Undeleted by Nawaf Bou-Rabee
deleted 829 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Post Deleted by Nawaf Bou-Rabee
added a key modifier
Source Link
Loading
added a sentence to drive home a point about that the desired lower bound does not hold
Source Link
Loading
http -> https (the question has been bumped anyway)
Source Link
Martin Sleziak
  • 4.7k
  • 4
  • 35
  • 40
Loading
Source Link
Loading