Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 28, 2022 at 3:59 comment added LSpice TeX note: please use $\operatorname{char}\mathbb{F}$ \operatorname{char}\mathbb{F}, not $\mathrm{char}\mathbb{F}$ \mathrm{char}\mathbb{F}; note the difference in spacing. I have edited accordingly.
May 28, 2022 at 3:58 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
`\operatorname`; deleted "Thank you"
May 28, 2022 at 3:23 answer added Jorge Zuniga timeline score: 4
May 26, 2022 at 3:59 comment added Jorge Zuniga @Federico_Poloni OK. Please hold on a couple of days.
May 26, 2022 at 3:23 comment added Jorge Zuniga Using formal expansion of operators, $\mathscr{A}^{−1}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=0}^∞(−\frac{1}{2})^nΔ^n$, where $Δ^n$ is the iterated forward difference operator [$Δ^n$ annihilates polynomials of degree lower than $n$]. The upper sum limit is finite for polynomials. Expanding $Δ^n$ in binomials gives an algorithm to find the polynomial inverse transformation you are looking for.
May 25, 2022 at 22:36 comment added Federico Poloni @JorgeZuniga This seems a good answer, but please post it as an answer, not as a comment.
May 25, 2022 at 16:02 answer added loup blanc timeline score: 7
May 24, 2022 at 14:11 comment added Francesco Polizzi Anyway, this should be somehow related to the inverse of the Pascal matrix: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1852826/…
May 24, 2022 at 9:30 comment added Francesco Polizzi Just a quick remark. Since $\mathscr{A}^{-1}$ is linear, computing $\mathscr{A}^{-1}(x^k)$ for all positive integers $k$ is enough. Perhaps you could try to guess a formula after computing some of them, and the prove it by induction.
May 24, 2022 at 7:31 history asked Zhihua Chang CC BY-SA 4.0