Timeline for Has any one seen this sum of roots of unity before?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2022 at 7:07 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 19, 2022 at 2:30 | vote | accept | Asvin | ||
| May 19, 2022 at 2:24 | answer | added | johng23 | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 19, 2022 at 1:42 | history | edited | Asvin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 19, 2022 at 1:23 | history | edited | Asvin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 126 characters in body; added 14 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
| May 19, 2022 at 0:35 | comment | added | GH from MO | Please use a high-level tag like "nt.number-theory". I added this tag now. | |
| May 19, 2022 at 0:35 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| May 18, 2022 at 23:26 | comment | added | Asvin | Yes. This is not an important constraint, I only chose it to make thing explicit. In general the sum should be large enough so that you cover an entire period for $(q_1^i,q_2^i)$. | |
| May 18, 2022 at 23:17 | comment | added | LSpice | Does "exactly divisible by $p$" mean "divisible by $p$ but not by $p^2$" here? | |
| May 18, 2022 at 23:17 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
TeX
|
| May 18, 2022 at 23:05 | history | asked | Asvin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |