Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

added 31 characters in body
Source Link
Megan
Megan
  • 1k
  • 7
  • 16

There are some classical examples of Real equivariant cohomology theories and twisted cohomology theories, including equivariant KR-theory in Atiyah and Segal's paper, and the more general construction, Freed-Moore K-theory. Most of the examples are related to K-theory.

I'm curious whether there is a general definition of "twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory". Should it just be boththe joint of twisted, Real, and Real equivariant cohomology theories? Should there be any desired relations between the three aspects, the Realness, equivariance, and twists? Is there any reference? Thanks.

There are some classical examples of Real equivariant cohomology theories and twisted cohomology theories, including equivariant KR-theory in Atiyah and Segal's paper, and the more general construction, Freed-Moore K-theory. Most of the examples are related to K-theory.

I'm curious whether there is a general definition of "twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory". Should it just be both twisted and Real equivariant? Should there be any desired relations between the three aspects, the Realness, equivariance, and twists? Is there any reference? Thanks.

There are some classical examples of Real equivariant cohomology theories and twisted cohomology theories, including equivariant KR-theory in Atiyah and Segal's paper, and the more general construction, Freed-Moore K-theory. Most of the examples are related to K-theory.

I'm curious whether there is a general definition of "twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory". Should it just be the joint of twisted, Real, and equivariant cohomology theories? Should there be any desired relations between the three aspects, the Realness, equivariance, and twists? Is there any reference? Thanks.

added 32 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Megan
Megan
  • 1k
  • 7
  • 16

There are some classical examples of Real equivariant cohomology theories and twisted cohomology theories, including equivariant KR-theory in Atiyah and Segal's paper, and the more general construction, Freed-Moore K-theory. Most of the examples are related to K-theory.

I'm curious whether there is a general definition of "twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory". Should it just be both twisted and Real equivariant? Should there be any desired relations between the three aspects, the Realness, equivariance, and twists? Is there any reference? Thanks.

There are some classical examples of Real equivariant cohomology theories and twisted cohomology theories, including equivariant KR-theory in Atiyah and Segal's paper, and the more general construction, Freed-Moore K-theory. Most of the examples are related to K-theory.

I'm curious whether there is a general definition of "twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory". Should it just be both twisted and Real equivariant? Should there be any desired relations between the three aspects, the Realness, equivariance, and twists?

There are some classical examples of Real equivariant cohomology theories and twisted cohomology theories, including equivariant KR-theory in Atiyah and Segal's paper, and the more general construction, Freed-Moore K-theory. Most of the examples are related to K-theory.

I'm curious whether there is a general definition of "twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory". Should it just be both twisted and Real equivariant? Should there be any desired relations between the three aspects, the Realness, equivariance, and twists? Is there any reference? Thanks.

Source Link
Megan
Megan
  • 1k
  • 7
  • 16

Is there a general definition of twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory?

There are some classical examples of Real equivariant cohomology theories and twisted cohomology theories, including equivariant KR-theory in Atiyah and Segal's paper, and the more general construction, Freed-Moore K-theory. Most of the examples are related to K-theory.

I'm curious whether there is a general definition of "twisted Real equivariant cohomology theory". Should it just be both twisted and Real equivariant? Should there be any desired relations between the three aspects, the Realness, equivariance, and twists?