Timeline for Takesaki lemma 1.16 (volume II, chapter VII)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2022 at 14:27 | vote | accept | Andromeda | ||
| May 17, 2022 at 13:46 | comment | added | Andromeda | I think the calculation of the convex hull can be left out. Indeed, the inclusion $\operatorname{conv}(F_0\cup(-A_+))\subseteq F_0-A_+$ is obvious (the right hand side is convex and contains $F_0$ and $-A_+$), the other one is clear by the reasoning in your answer (which does not use these set equalities). | |
| May 14, 2022 at 11:02 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | You are right. I hope I have now fixed these problems. This technique of using $(0,1)F$ instead of $F$ occurs elsewhere, when you want to get rid of "boundary" problems. | |
| May 14, 2022 at 11:01 | history | edited | Matthew Daws | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 878 characters in body
|
| May 14, 2022 at 8:34 | vote | accept | Andromeda | ||
| May 14, 2022 at 8:53 | |||||
| May 13, 2022 at 18:43 | history | edited | Matthew Daws | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 412 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2022 at 18:33 | history | answered | Matthew Daws | CC BY-SA 4.0 |