Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

Link to article, while this is on the front page
Source Link
LSpice
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

The main theorem of section 2.9 of Bernstein, Zelevinsky "Induced representations of reductive $p$-adic groups - I""Induced representations of reductive $\mathfrak p$-adic groups. I" gives a criterion for the existence of a non-zero intertwining operator between two parabolically induced representations. In your case the characters of the maximal split torus have to be conjugate under an elementofelement of the corresponding Weyl group.

You do not need to assume that $F$ has characteristic $0$.

The main theorem of section 2.9 of Bernstein, Zelevinsky "Induced representations of reductive $p$-adic groups - I" gives a criterion for the existence of a non-zero intertwining operator between two parabolically induced representations. In your case the characters of the maximal split torus have to be conjugate under an elementof the corresponding Weyl group.

You do not need to assume that $F$ has characteristic $0$.

The main theorem of section 2.9 of Bernstein, Zelevinsky "Induced representations of reductive $\mathfrak p$-adic groups. I" gives a criterion for the existence of a non-zero intertwining operator between two parabolically induced representations. In your case the characters of the maximal split torus have to be conjugate under an element of the corresponding Weyl group.

You do not need to assume that $F$ has characteristic $0$.

Source Link
Paul Broussous
Paul Broussous
  • 6.3k
  • 1
  • 19
  • 32

The main theorem of section 2.9 of Bernstein, Zelevinsky "Induced representations of reductive $p$-adic groups - I" gives a criterion for the existence of a non-zero intertwining operator between two parabolically induced representations. In your case the characters of the maximal split torus have to be conjugate under an elementof the corresponding Weyl group.

You do not need to assume that $F$ has characteristic $0$.