Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 7, 2022 at 6:58 comment added jh w Thank you for your answer. The trouble is ''a wrong step on can destroy the solvability'' by @YCor. I have tried to solve this problem in this approach, but it doesn't seem to go any further.
May 7, 2022 at 6:42 history edited Brendan McKay CC BY-SA 4.0
added 9 characters in body
May 7, 2022 at 6:30 comment added Brendan McKay @FedorPetrov I take it back. To show that only a finite number of steps is needed, one has to know that the sequence is bounded below, but that is obvious for both functions. I just chose one that reaches zero rather than some multiple of the square of the mean when all the numbers are equal, on a whim if you like. Our functions have an affine relationship anyway so the proof is equivalent.
May 7, 2022 at 6:25 history edited Brendan McKay CC BY-SA 4.0
added 7 characters in body
May 7, 2022 at 6:05 comment added Fedor Petrov I do not understand. The minimum of what?
May 7, 2022 at 5:48 comment added Brendan McKay @FedorPetrov First part now incorporated. The sum of squares is fine but then one has to argue what the minimum is (trivial, yes, but one extra step).
May 7, 2022 at 5:47 history edited Brendan McKay CC BY-SA 4.0
added 68 characters in body
May 7, 2022 at 4:47 comment added Fedor Petrov The numbers are rational, so you should start with multiplying them by a common denominator. Also, for $V$ we alternatively may take the sum of squares of all numbers.
May 7, 2022 at 4:13 history answered Brendan McKay CC BY-SA 4.0