Skip to main content
Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Pete L. Clark
  • 65.4k
  • 12
  • 241
  • 381

I often see in papers something like:

1) This is in general not true
or
2) This is not true in general
Which I personally would consider to be written formally as something like
  1. $\forall x: \not p(x)$$\forall x: \neg p(x)$
  2. $\exists x: \not p(x)$$\exists x: \neg p(x)$

But I wonder whether this is generally what is meant and if the mathematical community is careful about how they use the word "general" or if it used in a more colloquial sense. Being somewhat of an outsider I find this hard to judge. Partly as it is often used as an aside and rarely a formalisation of the statement is present to check it against.

It's the sort of thing you just can't look up.

I often see in papers something like:

1) This is in general not true
or
2) This is not true in general
Which I personally would consider to be written formally as something like
  1. $\forall x: \not p(x)$
  2. $\exists x: \not p(x)$

But I wonder whether this is generally what is meant and if the mathematical community is careful about how they use the word "general" or if it used in a more colloquial sense. Being somewhat of an outsider I find this hard to judge. Partly as it is often used as an aside and rarely a formalisation of the statement is present to check it against.

It's the sort of thing you just can't look up.

I often see in papers something like:

1) This is in general not true
or
2) This is not true in general
Which I personally would consider to be written formally as something like
  1. $\forall x: \neg p(x)$
  2. $\exists x: \neg p(x)$

But I wonder whether this is generally what is meant and if the mathematical community is careful about how they use the word "general" or if it used in a more colloquial sense. Being somewhat of an outsider I find this hard to judge. Partly as it is often used as an aside and rarely a formalisation of the statement is present to check it against.

It's the sort of thing you just can't look up.

Source Link
Lucas
  • 144
  • 6

In general... (convention in mathematical papers)

I often see in papers something like:

1) This is in general not true
or
2) This is not true in general
Which I personally would consider to be written formally as something like
  1. $\forall x: \not p(x)$
  2. $\exists x: \not p(x)$

But I wonder whether this is generally what is meant and if the mathematical community is careful about how they use the word "general" or if it used in a more colloquial sense. Being somewhat of an outsider I find this hard to judge. Partly as it is often used as an aside and rarely a formalisation of the statement is present to check it against.

It's the sort of thing you just can't look up.