Timeline for What is the most "informative" Yes/No math question you know? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2022 at 18:20 | history | left closed in review |
Alex M. Michael Albanese András Bátkai |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| May 4, 2022 at 17:33 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 5, 2022 at 18:20 | |||||
| May 4, 2022 at 15:24 | history | left closed in review |
Michael Albanese Alex M. András Bátkai |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| May 4, 2022 at 14:32 | history | edited | Stefan Kohl♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 4, 2022 at 14:31 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Stefan Kohl♦ | ||
| May 4, 2022 at 13:46 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | @JochenGlueck This might be the best question to ask them, really. | |
| May 4, 2022 at 13:24 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 4, 2022 at 15:24 | |||||
| May 4, 2022 at 13:02 | comment | added | Jochen Glueck | No I can't stop wondering what makes that alien civilization so confident that they will be able to answer any math question we might possibly ask... :-) | |
| May 4, 2022 at 12:40 | history | closed |
Fernando Muro Emil Jeřábek R. van Dobben de Bruyn Sean Eberhard Vidit Nanda |
Not suitable for this site | |
| May 4, 2022 at 12:37 | comment | added | Harry Wilson | Is the GRH really better than RH? It could be false, and disproving it just requires finding a single (edit: off axis) root of a single L-function, which provides very little information. GRH could still be true for infinitely many L-functions, which is often all one needs. | |
| May 4, 2022 at 11:39 | answer | added | Jukka Kohonen | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 4, 2022 at 9:26 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 4, 2022 at 12:46 | |||||
| May 4, 2022 at 9:02 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 4, 2022 at 7:55 | history | asked | Bogdan Grechuk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |