Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
Link to book
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Does property (V) imply the Grothendieck property for dual Banach spaces?

A Banach space $X$ has property (V) whenever for each Banach space $Y$, every unconditionally converging operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact; equivalently, every non-weakly compact operator $T:X\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace of $X$ isomorphic to $c_0$.

The space $X$ has the Grothendieck property whenever for each separable Banach space $Y$, every operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact.

Exercise VII.12 in J. DiestelDiestel's book "Sequences and series in Banach spaces""Sequences and series in Banach spaces" (Springer 1984) asks to prove that, for a dual space $X^*$, property (V) implies the Grothendieck property. It suggest to keep in mind Phillips's lemma.

Can anyone suggest an argument or a reference for the proof?

Note: Since separable spaces with the Grothendieck property are reflexive, the space $c_0$ shows that the result fails for non-dual spaces.

Does property (V) imply Grothendieck property for dual Banach spaces?

A Banach space $X$ has property (V) whenever for each Banach space $Y$, every unconditionally converging operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact; equivalently, every non-weakly compact operator $T:X\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace of $X$ isomorphic to $c_0$.

The space $X$ has Grothendieck property whenever for each separable Banach space $Y$, every operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact.

Exercise VII.12 in J. Diestel book "Sequences and series in Banach spaces" (Springer 1984) asks to prove that, for a dual space $X^*$, property (V) implies Grothendieck property. It suggest to keep in mind Phillips's lemma.

Can anyone suggest an argument or a reference for the proof?

Note: Since separable spaces with the Grothendieck property are reflexive, the space $c_0$ shows that the result fails for non-dual spaces.

Does property (V) imply the Grothendieck property for dual Banach spaces?

A Banach space $X$ has property (V) whenever for each Banach space $Y$, every unconditionally converging operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact; equivalently, every non-weakly compact operator $T:X\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace of $X$ isomorphic to $c_0$.

The space $X$ has the Grothendieck property whenever for each separable Banach space $Y$, every operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact.

Exercise VII.12 in J. Diestel's book "Sequences and series in Banach spaces" (Springer 1984) asks to prove that, for a dual space $X^*$, property (V) implies the Grothendieck property. It suggest to keep in mind Phillips's lemma.

Can anyone suggest an argument or a reference for the proof?

Note: Since separable spaces with the Grothendieck property are reflexive, the space $c_0$ shows that the result fails for non-dual spaces.

missprint correction
Source Link
M.González
  • 4.5k
  • 1
  • 16
  • 30

A Banach space $X$ has property (V) whenever for each Banach space $Y$, every unconditionally converging operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact; equivalently, every non-weakly compact operator $T:X\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace of $X$ isomorphic to $c_0$.

The space $X$ has Grothendieck property whenever for each separable Banach space $Y$, every operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact.

Exercise VII.12 in J. Diestel book "Sequences and series in Banach spaces" (Springer 1984) asks to prove that, foefor a dual space $X^*$, property (V) implyimplies Grothendieck property. It suggest to keep in mind Phillips's lemma.

Can anyone suggest an argument or a reference for the proof?

Note: Since separable spaces with the Grothendieck property are reflexive, the space $c_0$ shows that the result fails for non-dual spaces.

A Banach space $X$ has property (V) whenever for each Banach space $Y$, every unconditionally converging operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact; equivalently, every non-weakly compact operator $T:X\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace of $X$ isomorphic to $c_0$.

The space $X$ has Grothendieck property whenever for each separable Banach space $Y$, every operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact.

Exercise VII.12 in J. Diestel book "Sequences and series in Banach spaces" (Springer 1984) asks to prove that, foe a dual space $X^*$, property (V) imply Grothendieck property. It suggest to keep in mind Phillips's lemma.

Can anyone suggest an argument or a reference for the proof?

Note: Since separable spaces with the Grothendieck property are reflexive, the space $c_0$ shows that the result fails for non-dual spaces.

A Banach space $X$ has property (V) whenever for each Banach space $Y$, every unconditionally converging operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact; equivalently, every non-weakly compact operator $T:X\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace of $X$ isomorphic to $c_0$.

The space $X$ has Grothendieck property whenever for each separable Banach space $Y$, every operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact.

Exercise VII.12 in J. Diestel book "Sequences and series in Banach spaces" (Springer 1984) asks to prove that, for a dual space $X^*$, property (V) implies Grothendieck property. It suggest to keep in mind Phillips's lemma.

Can anyone suggest an argument or a reference for the proof?

Note: Since separable spaces with the Grothendieck property are reflexive, the space $c_0$ shows that the result fails for non-dual spaces.

Source Link
M.González
  • 4.5k
  • 1
  • 16
  • 30

Does property (V) imply Grothendieck property for dual Banach spaces?

A Banach space $X$ has property (V) whenever for each Banach space $Y$, every unconditionally converging operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact; equivalently, every non-weakly compact operator $T:X\to Y$ is an isomorphism on a subspace of $X$ isomorphic to $c_0$.

The space $X$ has Grothendieck property whenever for each separable Banach space $Y$, every operator $T:X\to Y$ is weakly compact.

Exercise VII.12 in J. Diestel book "Sequences and series in Banach spaces" (Springer 1984) asks to prove that, foe a dual space $X^*$, property (V) imply Grothendieck property. It suggest to keep in mind Phillips's lemma.

Can anyone suggest an argument or a reference for the proof?

Note: Since separable spaces with the Grothendieck property are reflexive, the space $c_0$ shows that the result fails for non-dual spaces.