Timeline for Is there an L^p tauberian theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2019 at 15:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jun 6, 2019 at 18:03 | |||||
| Jun 6, 2019 at 11:08 | comment | added | Adrián González Pérez | ok, I saw that it is already referenced bellow, never mind. | |
| Jun 6, 2019 at 11:03 | comment | added | Adrián González Pérez | Is the reference that I give to this answer relevant to this question: mathoverflow.net/questions/333317/… ? | |
| Mar 24, 2012 at 14:42 | comment | added | Bill Johnson |
In $$ $$ math.tamu.edu/~thomas.schlumprecht/ossz.pdf $$ $$ Odell, Sari, Schlumprecht, and Zheng prove an interesting non Tauberian theorem: the translates of an $L_1$ function cannot contain a Schauder basis for $L_1$, nor can translates of an $L_p$ function contain an unconditional Schauder basis for $L_p$ when $p \le 4$.
|
|
| Feb 1, 2010 at 5:54 | history | edited | Yemon Choi |
removed a couple of unneeded tags
|
|
| Nov 6, 2009 at 18:55 | vote | accept | Mark Lewko | ||
| Nov 5, 2009 at 19:11 | answer | added | ioannis.parissis | timeline score: 17 | |
| Nov 5, 2009 at 7:03 | comment | added | Mark Lewko | Not really. This problem came up in something I was thinking about about a long while ago. At the time I did some fairly intensive detective work trying to find a reference/answer. I remember finding passing references to the problem but I never was able to track down an answer. | |
| Nov 5, 2009 at 6:59 | answer | added | Yemon Choi | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 5, 2009 at 6:35 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | This feels like it should be known (in the sense either of having a characterization, or a result showing no reasonable characterization is possible). Unfortunately I can't remember anything definite. Have you had any luck on MathSciNet? | |
| Nov 5, 2009 at 5:12 | history | asked | Mark Lewko | CC BY-SA 2.5 |