Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 21, 2010 at 10:19 comment added simon Yes: the posterior distribution is intractable (that is, it doesn't have a nice analytic density function), so a random number generator (in this case, a Gibbs sampler) is used to obtain a sample, from which we can compute the quantities of interest (mean, credible intervals, etc.)
Oct 20, 2010 at 21:58 vote accept Tony Bruguier
Oct 20, 2010 at 21:58 vote accept Tony Bruguier
Oct 20, 2010 at 21:58
Oct 20, 2010 at 21:58 vote accept Tony Bruguier
Oct 20, 2010 at 21:58
Oct 19, 2010 at 19:01 comment added Tony Bruguier Thanks for the reference. I have been reading it, but I am not done yet. Just so that I make sure I understand correctly, the approach still uses a random number generator, right? It's just a smart way to go at it.
Oct 14, 2010 at 15:13 comment added simon I haven't read it, but this paper gives a method of computation for a Bayesian approach: stat.duke.edu/~scs/Courses/Stat376/Papers/Constraints/…
Oct 14, 2010 at 14:27 comment added Tony Bruguier Brian and Simon, Thanks for your answers. If the constraints are very narrow, then the vector $\hat{x}$ will most likely behave like a binary variable. If the constraints are very loose, then it $\hat{x}$ will behave like a normal variable. Sorry, I don't know how you would use Bayesian approach to solve this problem. Could you enlighten me? Also, please note that I am not interested in the pdf of $\hat{x}$, just its covariance matrix. I understand that a canned answer may or may not exist. The paper I reference seems to indicate that in 1976, there was no such answer.
Oct 14, 2010 at 11:52 history answered simon CC BY-SA 2.5