Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 9, 2023 at 5:21 vote accept XL _At_Here_There
Sep 7, 2022 at 0:37 vote accept XL _At_Here_There
Sep 7, 2022 at 4:12
Apr 27, 2022 at 0:30 comment added XL _At_Here_There @TimothyChow, maybe I have not clearly expressed my intuition.
Apr 27, 2022 at 0:29 comment added XL _At_Here_There @JosephO'Rourke, I do not think those physicists are correct. collapse of quantum state and time are not clear ideas, it is too early to say that causality has to be abandoned.
Apr 26, 2022 at 22:40 comment added Joseph O'Rourke Interestingly, some physicists have abandoned causality. See "Quantum Mischief Rewrites the Laws of Cause and Effect" in Quanta Magazine.
Apr 26, 2022 at 13:00 comment added Timothy Chow @XL_At_Here_There Your original question stated, as if it were an obvious fact, that causality is very similar to inference. But this is not at all an obvious fact. Your question was, "Why does math not care..." which is not a clear question. What does it mean to care? This does not appear to be a research-level question in mathematics.
Apr 26, 2022 at 12:51 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 12
Apr 26, 2022 at 8:36 comment added XL _At_Here_There @TimothyChow, it is reopen now, and I can not understand why people on the site vote close the post.
Apr 26, 2022 at 7:00 history reopened Timothy Chow
curious math guy
Paul Taylor
XL _At_Here_There
András Bátkai
Apr 25, 2022 at 21:40 comment added Paul Taylor Drew Moshier, who seems not to be on MO, proposed using the Scott topology for the time-like coordinate to account for causality in a rather simple way.
Apr 25, 2022 at 15:26 comment added Wojowu Related: mathoverflow.net/q/28224/30186
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:36 comment added Timothy Chow I've tried to rewrite the question to be more suitable for MO. If it is reopened, I plan to expand my comments above into an answer.
S Apr 25, 2022 at 14:36 review Reopen votes
Apr 26, 2022 at 7:00
S Apr 25, 2022 at 14:36 history edited Timothy Chow CC BY-SA 4.0
Rewrote the question to be clearer and more suitable for MO Added to review
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:29 history closed Andrés E. Caicedo
curious math guy
abx
Neil Strickland
Benjamin Steinberg
Needs details or clarity
Apr 25, 2022 at 1:54 history edited XL _At_Here_There CC BY-SA 4.0
added 118 characters in body
Apr 24, 2022 at 21:59 comment added Timothy Chow For a somewhat more philosophical discussion of the relationship between causality and if/then conditionals, see the article on counterfactual theories of causation. David Lewis tried to analyze causality in terms of logical conditionals, but his proposal was controversial, and in any case, he was using conditionals based on possible world semantics (modal logic) rather than the material conditional of classical mathematical logic.
Apr 24, 2022 at 21:52 comment added Timothy Chow The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on causal models is a good place to start reading about this topic. By the way, note that causality in modern physics is a much more subtle topic than you might think at first. So the superficial similarity between logical inference and causality is not as straightforward as it might seem at first glance.
Apr 24, 2022 at 20:10 review Close votes
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:31
Apr 24, 2022 at 14:10 comment added XL _At_Here_There @SamHopkins, possibly, it is closely related to physics. But I think inference and cause -effect are similar to each other.
Apr 24, 2022 at 13:05 comment added Sam Hopkins Someone more informed can say more, but I believe there have been attempts to axiomatize the rules of causality. Possibly this is considered philosophy, and not math.
Apr 24, 2022 at 12:59 history asked XL _At_Here_There CC BY-SA 4.0