Timeline for Is Koszul duality a deformation theory when not over a field?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2022 at 19:21 | comment | added | Jon Pridham | Brantner-Mathew isn't just char $p$. Section 6 does any complete local (simplicial or $E_{\infty}$) base, so includes zero and mixed characteristic. Section 5 of the same paper, and in particular Corollary 5.59, gives statements for other operads. | |
| Apr 18, 2022 at 19:19 | comment | added | Tim Campion | @user40276 Thanks, this is super-helpful! It's also possible I've chosen the "wrong" precise technical statement of my question, on account of not knowing enough about the subject. | |
| Apr 18, 2022 at 19:17 | comment | added | user40276 | If I've understood your question, Nuiten generalised Koszul duality for general base space (actually connective of characteristic $0$). See imag.umontpellier.fr/~nuiten/Writing/KoszulDualityLieAlgd.pdf . For characteristic $p$, there's Brantner-Mathew's arxiv.org/pdf/1904.07352.pdf . | |
| Apr 18, 2022 at 18:24 | history | edited | Tim Campion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Apr 18, 2022 at 18:17 | history | asked | Tim Campion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |