Timeline for Singularities of pairs
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2010 at 9:21 | history | edited | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 786 characters in body
|
| Oct 17, 2010 at 21:04 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | I also should have been clear that $W$ is still the image of some $E$ (a divisor on some birational model) whose associated discrepancy is $-1$. | |
| Oct 14, 2010 at 14:28 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | You are right, that last $\Delta$ should be a $W$. | |
| Oct 14, 2010 at 10:14 | comment | added | Sasha | Karl, it seems that something is wrong with $W$ and $\Delta$ in your comment. | |
| Oct 14, 2010 at 1:32 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | I would also agree that LC-centers are probably the wrong choice of words (especially when the pair in question is not log canonical). My personal preference is that $W \subseteq X$ is called an LC-center if $(X, \Delta)$ is LC at the generic point of $W$ but not KLT at that same generic point of $\Delta$. | |
| Oct 13, 2010 at 19:17 | history | answered | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 2.5 |