Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 18, 2022 at 16:45 comment added Richard Stanley @SamHopkins: I have done this, but for klein.mit.edu/~rstan/ec/ec2supp2.pdf.
Apr 17, 2022 at 21:12 history became hot network question
Apr 17, 2022 at 16:03 vote accept Jiu
Apr 17, 2022 at 15:58 answer added Random timeline score: 6
Apr 17, 2022 at 15:42 comment added Jiu @Random You're right!
Apr 17, 2022 at 15:39 comment added Random I might be missing something, but over a field of characteristic $p$, isn't the $p$-th derivative always $0$ which implies that everything is $D$-finite?
Apr 17, 2022 at 15:24 comment added Jiu @PeterTaylor First sentence in Comtet's article: "Soit y une fonction de la variable complexe x...". A part from this, in equation (4) from the proof, he divides by the derivative wrt y, which could be zero in positive characteristic.
Apr 17, 2022 at 15:09 comment added Sam Hopkins @RichardStanley: whoops, my apologies, I missed this!
Apr 17, 2022 at 15:03 comment added Richard Stanley Actually, it should have been stated in Theorem 6.4.6 that $\mathrm{char}\,K=0$ since the proof uses (6.12), for which it is assumed that $\mathrm{char}\,K=0$.
Apr 17, 2022 at 13:42 history edited YCor
edited tags
Apr 17, 2022 at 13:39 comment added Peter Taylor I don't see any mention of the field over which Comtet's proof is working. Have I missed something?
Apr 17, 2022 at 13:14 comment added Sam Hopkins See Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Vol. 2, Theorem 6.4.6. I'm pretty sure he's working over an arbitrary field in this theorem.
Apr 17, 2022 at 13:11 history asked Jiu CC BY-SA 4.0