Skip to main content
added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Saúl RM
  • 10.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 48

We can modify the connectedness argument to show it also holds for homeomorphisms: suppose $\omega(x)$ is contained in aan open ball $B(0,R)$, with $R>0$, and let $N$ be so big that $T(B(0,2R))\subseteq B(0,N)$$T(B(0,R))\subseteq B(0,N)$.

Then if the positive orbit of $x$ is not bounded, it must contain infinite points inside $B(0,N)\setminus B(0,2R)$$B(0,N)\setminus B(0,R)$, which contradicts the fact that $\omega(x)\subseteq B(0,R)$.

We can modify the connectedness argument to show it also holds for homeomorphisms: suppose $\omega(x)$ is contained in a ball $B(0,R)$, with $R>0$, and let $N$ be so big that $T(B(0,2R))\subseteq B(0,N)$.

Then if the positive orbit of $x$ is not bounded, it must contain infinite points inside $B(0,N)\setminus B(0,2R)$, which contradicts the fact that $\omega(x)\subseteq B(0,R)$.

We can modify the connectedness argument to show it also holds for homeomorphisms: suppose $\omega(x)$ is contained in an open ball $B(0,R)$, with $R>0$, and let $N$ be so big that $T(B(0,R))\subseteq B(0,N)$.

Then if the positive orbit of $x$ is not bounded, it must contain infinite points inside $B(0,N)\setminus B(0,R)$, which contradicts the fact that $\omega(x)\subseteq B(0,R)$.

Source Link
Saúl RM
  • 10.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 48

We can modify the connectedness argument to show it also holds for homeomorphisms: suppose $\omega(x)$ is contained in a ball $B(0,R)$, with $R>0$, and let $N$ be so big that $T(B(0,2R))\subseteq B(0,N)$.

Then if the positive orbit of $x$ is not bounded, it must contain infinite points inside $B(0,N)\setminus B(0,2R)$, which contradicts the fact that $\omega(x)\subseteq B(0,R)$.