Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 20, 2022 at 21:22 history edited MathTolliob CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Apr 14, 2022 at 20:11 history closed LSpice
Najib Idrissi
abx
Andreas Blass
John Wiltshire-Gordon
Not suitable for this site
S Apr 14, 2022 at 19:57 history suggested J. W. Tanner CC BY-SA 4.0
corrected spelling
Apr 14, 2022 at 19:19 review Suggested edits
S Apr 14, 2022 at 19:57
Apr 14, 2022 at 15:29 comment added YCor One-to-one correspondence (as opposed to "one-to-one map") sounds like a bijection, so I'd rather rephrase the title as "Injection vs bijection..."
Apr 14, 2022 at 15:28 history edited YCor CC BY-SA 4.0
formatting
Apr 14, 2022 at 14:35 review Close votes
Apr 14, 2022 at 20:11
Apr 14, 2022 at 14:32 comment added Najib Idrissi This isn't really a research-level question. Dozens of variations have been asked and answered on MSE, see e.g. math.stackexchange.com/q/679584/10014 math.stackexchange.com/q/573378/10014
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:56 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn Whereas when $V$ is of infinite dimension, the two sides are always abstractly isomorphic: if $\dim V$ is some infinite cardinal $\kappa$, then $V \otimes V$ has dimension $\kappa^2 = \kappa$, hence $V \cong V \otimes V$. Similarly, $V^* \otimes V^* \cong V^*$, so both sides are (very non-canonically) isomorphic to $V^*$.
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:52 answer added YCor timeline score: 9
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:43 comment added MathTolliob @R.vanDobbendeBruyn When $V$ is of infinite dimension, the natural map is never an isomorphism, otherwise, the element constructed by Wojowu would have been in the image of $V^\star \otimes V^\star$ and would not have been a counter-example
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:42 comment added YCor @NikWeaver this is not a basis.
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:39 history edited MathTolliob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 39 characters in body
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:37 comment added MathTolliob @NikWeaver What you said is not clear for me... Could you, please, explicit it?
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:35 comment added MathTolliob @R.vanDobbendeBruyn You're totaly right! That is my question. An answer should be constructed from Wojowu counter example
Apr 14, 2022 at 13:32 history edited YCor
edited tags
Apr 14, 2022 at 12:57 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn I think the final question is not quite what you want to ask. It's likely that in many (all?) cases, the dimensions of $V^* \otimes V^*$ and $(V \otimes V)^*$ are the same, so they are abstractly isomorphic. That's not the interesting question; the interesting question is whether the natural map $V^* \otimes V^* \to (V \otimes V)^*$ is an isomorphism.
Apr 14, 2022 at 12:52 comment added Wojowu @NikWeaver You can identify the algebraic dual with the set of functions from $B$ into $k$, but how do you form a basis out of it?
Apr 14, 2022 at 11:12 comment added MathTolliob Could we nevertheless construct a basis of $(V \otimes V)^\star$?
Apr 14, 2022 at 11:09 comment added MathTolliob OK, nice (counter-)example! The problem comes from the fact that this element could not be spanned by a finite sum of $(b_1 \otimes b_2)^\star$... Thank you Wojowu
Apr 14, 2022 at 10:52 comment added Wojowu $B^*$ does not span $V^*$ if $V$ is infinite-dimensional, and similarly for $C^*$. As for an "explicit example", literally any infinite-dimensional $V$: formally, we can define an element of $(V\otimes V)^*$ which maps any element to the sum of coefficients in the expansion in the basis $b_1\otimes b_2$.
Apr 14, 2022 at 10:48 history edited MathTolliob CC BY-SA 4.0
added 118 characters in body
Apr 14, 2022 at 10:42 history asked MathTolliob CC BY-SA 4.0