Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 4 at 7:59 comment added Keeley Hoek Under the identification $T(E \otimes F) \cong E \otimes TF$ (in the sense meant above), I believe the connector is actually just $K_{E \otimes F} = \operatorname{id}_E \otimes K_F : E \otimes TF \to E \otimes F$. The reason is that the connection on $E$ is used in the identification $E \otimes TF \cong T(E \otimes F)$ in the first place. I have sorted this out in my answer over here on math.se (at the bottom).
Apr 13, 2022 at 12:55 vote accept Raz Kupferman
Apr 12, 2022 at 20:01 history bounty ended Raz Kupferman
Apr 12, 2022 at 8:25 history edited Peter Michor CC BY-SA 4.0
added 82 characters in body
Apr 12, 2022 at 7:03 history edited David Roberts CC BY-SA 4.0
small maths fix
Apr 12, 2022 at 7:01 history edited Peter Michor CC BY-SA 4.0
answered questions in the comments
Apr 12, 2022 at 5:55 history edited Peter Michor CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1156 characters in body
Apr 12, 2022 at 4:27 comment added Raz Kupferman Thanks Peter. Two issues: (1) under this angle, it is no longer transparent that it is a vector bundle over $E\otimes F$. (2) How do horizontal bundles of $TE$ and $TF$ define a horizontal bundle of $T(E\otimes F)$?
Apr 11, 2022 at 19:23 history answered Peter Michor CC BY-SA 4.0