Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by Noah Schweber
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by Noah Schweber
added 445 characters in body
Source Link
Noah Schweber
  • 21.1k
  • 10
  • 110
  • 331

This was originally an MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order logic with equality, but whose equality-free theory $Th(C)$ is not finitely axiomatizable?


Non-OP edit: To clarify, the question is whether the finite $\mathsf{FOL}$-axiomatizability of $Th_\mathsf{FOL}(C)$ necessarily implies the finite $\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}$-axiomatizability of $Th_{\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}}(C)$, regardless of whether the $\mathsf{FOL}$-deductive closure of $Th_{\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}}(C)$ coincides with $Th_\mathsf{FOL}(C)$ or not. (That is, we don't care whether $Mod(Th_{\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}}(C))\not=C.$)

This was originally an MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order logic with equality, but whose equality-free theory $Th(C)$ is not finitely axiomatizable?

This was originally an MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order logic with equality, but whose equality-free theory $Th(C)$ is not finitely axiomatizable?


Non-OP edit: To clarify, the question is whether the finite $\mathsf{FOL}$-axiomatizability of $Th_\mathsf{FOL}(C)$ necessarily implies the finite $\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}$-axiomatizability of $Th_{\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}}(C)$, regardless of whether the $\mathsf{FOL}$-deductive closure of $Th_{\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}}(C)$ coincides with $Th_\mathsf{FOL}(C)$ or not. (That is, we don't care whether $Mod(Th_{\mathsf{FOL_{w/o=}}}(C))\not=C.$)

added 134 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Noah Schweber
  • 21.1k
  • 10
  • 110
  • 331

This was originally a MSE questionan MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order logic with equality, but whose equality-free theory $Th(C)$ is not finitely axiomatizable?

This was originally a MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order logic with equality, but whose equality-free theory $Th(C)$ is not finitely axiomatizable?

This was originally an MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order logic with equality, but whose equality-free theory $Th(C)$ is not finitely axiomatizable?

Source Link
user107952
  • 2k
  • 16
  • 24

Is there a finitely axiomatizable class of structures whose equality-free theory is not finitely axiomatizable?

This was originally a MSE question, but I was told to ask it on MathOverflow. Does there exist a class $C$ of $L$-structures for a finite signature $L$, which is finitely axiomatizable in first-order logic with equality, but whose equality-free theory $Th(C)$ is not finitely axiomatizable?