Timeline for Would you help me to find this expression?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2022 at 1:25 | comment | added | Silvinha | @DeaneYang Hi. I am back after a long time ago. Sorry, for my late answer. I was working on this doubt for a long time, over and over again. I think I simplified it. I hope that now this can have a solution. This is the link: mathoverflow.net/questions/424659/… | |
| May 2, 2022 at 20:23 | history | edited | Silvinha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved formating
|
| Apr 20, 2022 at 12:24 | history | edited | Silvinha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| Apr 20, 2022 at 11:37 | history | edited | Silvinha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 17, 2022 at 20:18 | comment | added | Silvinha | @DeaneYang I agree with you. I will make changes as soon as possible again. I intend to create a new question with fewer variables. I intend to keep this question because I sent the link to authors. I appreciate all advice, thanks. | |
| Mar 16, 2022 at 16:27 | comment | added | Deane Yang | @Silvinha, here's my perspective: The odds that there's someone reading MathOverflow who has or is reading the same paper are pretty low. On the other hand, the odds that there is someone who knows this stuff inside out are pretty good. Lots of such experts here. The easier you make it for them to read and understand the chain of inequalities, the more likely you'll get an answer. Here's the other thing: When I'm trying to understand something like this, I always rewrite the argument myself in the simplest way possible. Just doing that often clarifies what's going on a lot. | |
| Mar 16, 2022 at 12:40 | comment | added | Silvinha | @DeaneYang I've just included all the data that was lacking. I decided to keep the variables in case someone has already started reading, or even if someone is patient enough to read this article page, then they won't feel lost. I believe that now the question is self-contained. Thanks for your suggestions. | |
| Mar 16, 2022 at 12:31 | history | edited | Silvinha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| Mar 14, 2022 at 13:30 | comment | added | Daniele Tampieri | @Silvinha you’re welcome. I am glad to have bene of some help. | |
| Mar 14, 2022 at 12:52 | comment | added | Silvinha | @DanieleTampieri I would like to thank you for all corrections you've made. | |
| Mar 13, 2022 at 20:11 | comment | added | LSpice | All else aside, there's so much MathJax here that my browser completely chokes on it, and produces a jumbled mess. | |
| Mar 13, 2022 at 16:52 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Further hyperlinking + cited explicitly the reference
|
| Mar 13, 2022 at 14:52 | comment | added | Deane Yang | I suggest you rewrite your calculations and this question completely. What you've written here appears to be using the same notation as in the original paper and contains many constants whose significance is unclear, such as $m$ and $q$. A link to the paper does not suffice. The question should be self-contained. I suggest rewriting this using fewer constants, only the essential ones. Also, I suggest replacing $2^*$ by its actual value. That makes the algebra much clearer. I also suggest writing the initial analytic inequalities in a simpler form. | |
| Mar 13, 2022 at 7:31 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Formula hyperlinking
|
| Mar 12, 2022 at 19:28 | history | asked | Silvinha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |