Skip to main content

Timeline for Consequences of Geometric Langlands

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 9, 2013 at 21:55 history edited Alicia Garcia-Raboso CC BY-SA 3.0
MathJax
Dec 6, 2009 at 0:43 history edited Ilya Nikokoshev
retag
Nov 29, 2009 at 3:59 vote accept Charles Siegel
Nov 5, 2009 at 17:16 answer added David Ben-Zvi timeline score: 69
Nov 5, 2009 at 3:10 history edited Charles Siegel CC BY-SA 2.5
added 4 characters in body
Nov 5, 2009 at 2:58 comment added S. Carnahan I recommend replacing "local systems" with "G-local systems".
Nov 5, 2009 at 2:23 history edited Charles Siegel CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 84 characters in body
Nov 5, 2009 at 2:23 comment added Charles Siegel Ahh, will remove that and just say "stack." Still figuring out how everything works.
Nov 5, 2009 at 2:01 comment added David Ben-Zvi hmm.. that attempt to write the multiplicative group failed miserably, sorry..
Nov 5, 2009 at 2:01 comment added David Ben-Zvi Local systems don't form a $C^\times$ gerbe.. irreducible GL_n local systems do (in general irreducible local systems form a gerbe for the center of the group), but general local systems are not a gerbe for any group (like any nice stack they're stratified by gerbes for the various stabilizer groups)
Nov 5, 2009 at 1:40 comment added Charles Siegel Added a link to Frenkel, Gaitsgory and Vilonen's paper, it does stuff for the case GL(n) over any field, I think.
Nov 5, 2009 at 1:39 history edited Charles Siegel CC BY-SA 2.5
added 178 characters in body
Nov 5, 2009 at 1:26 comment added Charles Siegel Well, I added something. Can't promise it's a helpful description of the conjecture. Had a bit of trouble with the latex renderer, else I'd have written everything out.
Nov 5, 2009 at 1:23 history edited Charles Siegel CC BY-SA 2.5
added 1067 characters in body
Nov 5, 2009 at 1:13 comment added Chris Schommer-Pries And maybe for us novices, what does the conjecture say?
Nov 5, 2009 at 0:46 history asked Charles Siegel CC BY-SA 2.5