Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 1, 2022 at 10:12 comment added Fedor Pakhomov @FarmerS At least for me the natural interpretation of the the term "fragment of $T$" is that it is a theory $U$ in the same language as $T$ such that $U$ as a set of theorems is contained in $T$ as a set of theorems.
Mar 1, 2022 at 10:09 comment added Fedor Pakhomov It isn't provable in $\mathsf{ZFC}$. Consider $T=\mathsf{ZFC}^-+(V=L)\to \mathsf{PowerSet}$. In $\mathsf{ZFC}$ we could construct a countable transitive model of $T$ by adding a Cohen real to a countable transitive model of $\mathsf{ZFC}^-$. However, any constructive model of $T$ is also a model of $\mathsf{ZFC}$ thus by 2-nd incompleteness theorem $\mathsf{ZFC}$ couldn't prove that there are constructive models of $T$. Therefore $\mathsf{ZFC}$ doesn't prove the implication "there is a countable transitive model of $T$" $\Rightarrow$ "there is a countable transitive constructive model of $T$".
Feb 27, 2022 at 22:19 comment added Ali Enayat @EmilJeřábek you are right Emil. In the mean time Farmer has pointed out that the current formulation is defective.
Feb 27, 2022 at 18:01 comment added Farmer S There are no proper fragments of ZFC which properly extend the ZFC$^-$, since there is only one axiom difference between ZFC and ZFC$^-$.
Feb 27, 2022 at 6:32 comment added Emil Jeřábek @Ali Does it? The answer involves $V\ne L$, hence it is not a subtheory of ZFC.
Feb 27, 2022 at 4:04 comment added Ali Enayat The negative nswer to your other question (mathoverflow.net/questions/416884/…) by Andreas Blass also answers this one in the negative.
Feb 26, 2022 at 21:39 history edited Frode Alfson Bjørdal CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Feb 26, 2022 at 20:54 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
TeX
Feb 26, 2022 at 18:34 history asked Frode Alfson Bjørdal CC BY-SA 4.0