Skip to main content
Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Authoritative reference needed by Guido Li
Bounty Started worth 400 reputation by Guido Li
added 12 characters in body
Source Link
Guido Li
  • 73
  • 1
  • 14

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$$\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}=2(1+\alpha).$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ the matrix $A_0$ is just the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

To clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ the matrix $A_0$ is just the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

To clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}=2(1+\alpha).$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ the matrix $A_0$ is just the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

To clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Guido Li
  • 73
  • 1
  • 14

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ thisthe matrix $A_0$ is just the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

To clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ this matrix is the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

To clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ the matrix $A_0$ is just the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

To clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

added 164 characters in body
Source Link
Guido Li
  • 73
  • 1
  • 14

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ this matrix is the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

Please let me know if you have any questionsTo clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ this matrix is the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Consider the $N \times N$ matrix

$$A_{\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & -1 & -\alpha & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ -1 & \lambda_2 & -1 & -\alpha & \cdots & 0\\ -\alpha & -1 & \ddots & \ddots & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & -\alpha & -1 & \lambda_{N-2} & -1 & -\alpha \\ 0 & \cdots & -\alpha & -1 &\lambda_{N-1} & -1 \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & -\alpha &-1 &\lambda_N \\ \end{pmatrix}$$

The parameters $\lambda$ are defined such that the row sum or equivalently the column sum is equal to zero. This also means that $\lambda_3=\lambda_4 =...=\lambda_{N-2}.$

If $\alpha \equiv 0$ this matrix is the discrete Neumann Laplacian and it is well-known that all eigenvectors $v=(v_1,...,v_N) \in \mathbb C^N$ of $A_0$ have the property that the first entry $v_1$ and the last entry $v_N$ do not satisfy a Dirichlet condition, i.e. $v_1,v_N$ are not equal to zero, see e.g. here

I conjecture based on numerical experiments that there exists $\varepsilon>0$, independent of $N$ such that the same is true for $A_{\alpha} \in \mathbb C^{N \times N}$ with $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon).$

To clarify: I do not claim that $v_1$ and $v_N$ are independent of $N$. I claim that there exists $\varepsilon>0$ independent of $N$ such that for all $\alpha \in (0,\varepsilon)$ both $v_1, v_N$ are non-zero!

added 49 characters in body
Source Link
Guido Li
  • 73
  • 1
  • 14
Loading
added 54 characters in body
Source Link
Guido Li
  • 73
  • 1
  • 14
Loading
added 63 characters in body
Source Link
Guido Li
  • 73
  • 1
  • 14
Loading
Source Link
Guido Li
  • 73
  • 1
  • 14
Loading