Timeline for Interview of Connes, Caramello, and L. Lafforgue about topos theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2022 at 19:59 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 48 characters in body
|
| Feb 18, 2022 at 17:49 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | You are answering the question "Why should topos theory be taken seriously?" The question is asking specifically why it is not. | |
| Feb 18, 2022 at 17:40 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | well, I answered before the question was revised; the original question was "Why is topos theory not taken seriously?" and I just wished to point out one area of research where it is taken seriously. | |
| Feb 18, 2022 at 17:39 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
entered the question as originally posed
|
| Feb 18, 2022 at 15:42 | comment | added | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | This is a fine piece of mathematics, but I don’t see how it’s an answer to this question — it’s no more “serious” than hundreds of other papers or projects in the field. If it has some particular relevance to the question that I’m missing, it would be helpful to mention that! | |
| Feb 18, 2022 at 15:10 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |