Skip to main content
deleted 48 characters in body
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

Q: [as originally formulated by the OP] Why is topos theory not taken seriously?

The way this question is phrased seems too subjective, but I may point out that topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with which to formulate quantum theory. See the Bohr topos entry in nLab. It is not mainstream, but it is a serious development in the context of quantum logic.

Q: [as originally formulated by the OP] Why is topos theory not taken seriously?

The way this question is phrased seems too subjective, but I may point out that topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with which to formulate quantum theory. See the Bohr topos entry in nLab. It is not mainstream, but it is a serious development in the context of quantum logic.

Q: Why is topos theory not taken seriously?

The way this question is phrased seems too subjective, but I may point out that topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with which to formulate quantum theory. See the Bohr topos entry in nLab. It is not mainstream, but it is a serious development in the context of quantum logic.

entered the question as originally posed
Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

Q: [as originally formulated by the OP] Why is topos theory not taken seriously?

The way thethis question is phrased seems too subjective, but I may point out that topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with which to formulate quantum theory. See the Bohr topos entry in nLab. It is not mainstream, but it is a serious development in the context of quantum logic.

The way the question is phrased seems too subjective, but I may point out that topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with which to formulate quantum theory. See the Bohr topos entry in nLab. It is not mainstream, but it is a serious development in the context of quantum logic.

Q: [as originally formulated by the OP] Why is topos theory not taken seriously?

The way this question is phrased seems too subjective, but I may point out that topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with which to formulate quantum theory. See the Bohr topos entry in nLab. It is not mainstream, but it is a serious development in the context of quantum logic.

Source Link
Carlo Beenakker
  • 188.1k
  • 18
  • 448
  • 651

The way the question is phrased seems too subjective, but I may point out that topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with which to formulate quantum theory. See the Bohr topos entry in nLab. It is not mainstream, but it is a serious development in the context of quantum logic.