Timeline for Does a finite-dimensional Lie algebra always exponentiate into a universal covering group
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2010 at 14:51 | answer | added | Greg Kuperberg | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 7:59 | answer | added | Greg Kuperberg | timeline score: 17 | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 4:19 | answer | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 4:15 | history | edited | Victor Galitski | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 142 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2010 at 4:11 | answer | added | Dick Palais | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 3:54 | answer | added | algori | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 3:37 | comment | added | Aaron Mazel-Gee | I've heard that there are connected groups for which the exponential map is not surjective, which fact should lift to the universal covering group. This might be a negative answer to (3)? Although I'm confused by your using the word "generated" vs. writing an actual equality. | |
| Oct 10, 2010 at 3:12 | history | asked | Victor Galitski | CC BY-SA 2.5 |