Timeline for Has the "partial Sophomore's Dream function" been studied before?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2022 at 19:40 | vote | accept | Max Lonysa Muller | ||
| Feb 15, 2022 at 16:47 | comment | added | Max Lonysa Muller | Ah I see! Interesting result | |
| Feb 15, 2022 at 16:32 | comment | added | FusRoDah | @Max Muller Yes, that is correct. What I did there is just reversing the two summations, so the summand itself stays unchanged. And exactly because there is no $r$, we can simplify to the single sum. | |
| Feb 15, 2022 at 10:16 | comment | added | Max Lonysa Muller | Thank you! Minor nitpick: is there maybe a small typo in the second equality for $A$? There the inner sum goes from $r=1$ to $r=n-1$, but there's no $r$ in the summands | |
| Feb 14, 2022 at 22:35 | history | answered | FusRoDah | CC BY-SA 4.0 |