Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Stopple, Peter Humphries, Lucia, GH from MO, LSpice
added 229 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930

The exploration of the asymptotic behavior of a simple sum. $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (k^{1/k} - 1)$

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ Does this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x$ is the square root of any natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

Edit: Hi everyone, I didn't know the strict format of this site. Please see the selected answer as a beautiful solution to my first question, and please consider the rest of this post as exposition of how the sum diverges.

The exploration of the asymptotic behavior of a simple sum. $\sum_{k=1} (k^{1/k} - 1)$

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ Does this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x$ is the square root of any natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

The exploration of the asymptotic behavior of a simple sum. $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (k^{1/k} - 1)$

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ Does this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x$ is the square root of any natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

Edit: Hi everyone, I didn't know the strict format of this site. Please see the selected answer as a beautiful solution to my first question, and please consider the rest of this post as exposition of how the sum diverges.

added 17 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ Does this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x^{2}$$x$ is athe square root of any natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ Does this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x^{2}$ is a natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ Does this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x$ is the square root of any natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

added 20 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ HowDoes this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x^{2}$ is a natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x^{2}$ is a natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

An informal investigation of a sum.

Consider this sum: $$S =\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k} -1)$$ Does this converge? How does it behave as it diverges, if it diverges? If $k$ equaled $1$ we would get $0$ so we start at $k=2$. Very generally we can find that: $k^{1/k}$ will always be $1$ + a remainder. After subtracting $1$ from each term, each term will be a value less than $1$. Not too illuminating so far.

Let's raise the second k to a power t so we can examine how tweaking that variable affects the output $S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^t} -1)$. When $t=1$ it is the original and the partial sums seem to rise and rise, but is unclear of the final behavior.

Breaking $t$ out in parts, lets set $t = (1 + \frac{1}{x})$, $$S_x=\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1).$$

Numerically, these sums seem to converge when $x$ is finite, but its difficult to calculate when x gets large. Calculating some values, we find a pattern at last! We find $S_2 = 4$ plus a remainder less than $1$. Going further $S_3 = 9$ plus a remainder less than $1$, and $S_{100} = 10,000$ plus a remainder less than $1$. The output always seems to be the square plus a remainder! It seems true that $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = \lfloor x^{2}\rfloor$$ when $x^{2}$ is a natural number greater than 1. Here are some examples: $S_4 = 16.238932773$, $S_{12} = 144.5937831$, $S_{\sqrt{1729}} = 1729.84841$, $S_{50000} = 2500000000.988421705$.

Does that remainder ever get higher than one? Let's get another perspective on the sum to see if we can calculate that remainder at the limit as ${x \to {\infty}}$.

Time to transform the sum so we can get a handle on why its the square plus a remainder, and try to get a handle on that remainder. Remembering that $t = (1 + 1/x)$, see that: $$k^{1/k^t}=e^{(\log k)/k^t} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ Let's define $$S_t = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}\right) -1$$ Notice when $n=0$ we get $1$, so it cancels the $-1$ term resulting in: $$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}}$$ What is effectively adding column by column instead of row by row, we get:$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{n! k^{n t}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{\left( \log k \right)^n}{k^{n t}}$$

Using the definition $$\zeta^{(n)}(t) = e^{i \pi n}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{\log k ^{n}}{k^{t}}$$ valid for all $n\in\mathbb{R}, t\in\mathbb{C}$,

we get $$S_t = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}\zeta^{(n)}(nt)$$

Since we'll be looking at the Zeta function close to it's pole at $1$, let's expand $\zeta$ with the Laurent expansion of the Zeta function expanded around 1. $\gamma$ represents the Stieltjes constants.

$$\zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!}(s-1)^{n}$$ Giving us $$\zeta^{'}(s) = -\frac1{(s-1)^2} -\gamma_1 +\gamma_2(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_3(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{''}(s) = \frac2{(s-1)^3} +\gamma_2 -\gamma_3(s-1)+\frac12\gamma_4(s-1)^2\cdots$$ $$\zeta^{'''}(s) = -\frac6{(s-1)^4} -\gamma_3 +\gamma_4(s-1)-\frac12\gamma_5(s-1)^2...$$ Using these interpretations and setting $s = n(1+\frac1x)$ and examining what occurs when $x \to \infty$ allows us to see why the output of $S_x$ is always $x^2$ plus a constant less than 1. As before, we can add column by column instead of row by row for the summations of the Laurent series.

Examining the largest term when $n=1$, we have $$\frac1{((1+\frac1x)-1)^2} = x^2$$ $x^2$ obviously diverges, so already we can tell the original sum $S$ diverges. Let's keep going to see how the remainder term behaves as $x \to \infty$. When $n=2$ and greater, the terms such as $\frac{2}{(s-1)^3} = \frac2{(n-1)^3}$ turn into finite values. Summing all the terms in $S_t$, setting $t=1+\frac1x$ and letting x zoom off, we arrive at the limiting behavior of the sum $S_x$.

$$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} = C,$$

and $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\gamma_n}{n!} = \frac12 - \gamma_0,$$

and $$\lim_{x \to \infty}\Big|\Big(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}(k^{1/k^{1+1/x}} -1)\Big)-x^2\Big| = \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{(n-1)^{n+1}} + \sum_{k=3}^{\infty}\sum_{n=k}^\infty(-1)^k\frac{\gamma_n(n-k+1)^{k-2}}{(n-k+2)!(k-2)!} + \frac12 - \gamma_0 = C$$ .

$\gamma_n$ is bounded by $|\gamma_n| < \frac{n!}{2^{n+1}}$, which can show convergence, and numerically it stabilizes within the realm of testing.

$$C = 0.988549601142268750644\ldots$$

So it seems $$\sum_{k=2}^\infty (k^{1/(k^{1+1/x})} -1) = x^2 + C_x,$$ where $-0.028501\ldots < C_x < C$, $x\geq1$ , and $x \in \mathbb{R}$ , where $-0.028501\ldots$ is $C_x$ when $x=1$. $C_x$ is positive when roughly $x>~1.37$.

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading
deleted 6 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading
added 18 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading
added 18 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading
deleted 13 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Michael Hardy
  • 1
  • 12
  • 85
  • 126
Loading
deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading
Post Undeleted by user475930
Post Deleted by user475930
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading
Source Link
user475930
user475930
Loading