Timeline for Modern results that are widely known, yet which at the time were ignored, not accepted or criticized
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2022 at 23:10 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Asaf Karagila♦ | ||
| Feb 5, 2022 at 22:01 | comment | added | Alessandro Della Corte | Yes, it took some 10 years or so for it to generate widespread interest. Looks like you want something more spectacular... | |
| Feb 5, 2022 at 21:56 | comment | added | alhal | I have read the Scholarpedia entry, but other than some fiddling about what to put in the abstract at some conference, not too much seem to point to the fact that there was resistance towards this results. Once it was published in English, about 10 years later it seems to already have been popularized (acc. to the History section from the link). | |
| Feb 5, 2022 at 21:45 | history | answered | Alessandro Della Corte | CC BY-SA 4.0 |