Timeline for Spec Z analogue of Thurston program?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2023 at 14:03 | comment | added | HJRW | The question linked to does NOT support the statement that there is a clean number-theoretic analogue of the Poincaré conjecture. | |
| S Jul 30, 2023 at 22:54 | history | suggested | Tabes Bridges | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed formatting
|
| Jul 30, 2023 at 20:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 30, 2023 at 22:54 | |||||
| Sep 5, 2013 at 5:51 | history | undeleted | Kim Morrison | ||
| Jul 8, 2013 at 9:48 | history | edited | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed maths rendering
|
| Aug 21, 2012 at 7:21 | history | deleted | user631 | ||
| Nov 10, 2009 at 21:49 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | @FC: makes sense, +1. Anyway, I agree I know nothing about what an analogue of Poincare for number fields could be. | |
| Nov 4, 2009 at 22:23 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | It doesn't give me the intuition, either, but the authors of 0904.3399 provide a different reformulation of Poincare, true for number fields, and they apparently have intuition in mind for it: "According to our analogy, the difficulty of the original Poincar ́e conjecture may be coming from that of the corresponding analytic method–gauge theory–in topology." | |
| Nov 4, 2009 at 21:50 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | It's not completely tight, but it works surpisingly well for some theorems, like Poincare conjecture -- see, e.g. my answer to the linked question. | |
| Nov 4, 2009 at 21:45 | history | answered | user631 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |