Timeline for Need list of top journals with shortest review time [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2022 at 7:56 | history | closed |
abx Alexandre Eremenko Stefan Waldmann Jeremy Rickard Alec Rhea |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jan 27, 2022 at 14:26 | vote | accept | StarLight | ||
| Jan 27, 2022 at 14:26 | |||||
| Jan 27, 2022 at 10:20 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Looking at your other questions on math.SE, I'm not convinced that you will find the top journals to be what you think them to be. | |
| Jan 27, 2022 at 10:00 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | The very top journals actually tend to have rather longish review times for papers they accept, because the papers are substantial and important, and so the referees seem to take a more thorough approach, from what I understand. If you need your work out quick, then a preprint 8s a better option. | |
| Jan 27, 2022 at 9:32 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 30, 2022 at 7:56 | |||||
| Jan 27, 2022 at 9:10 | answer | added | Gerald Edgar | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 27, 2022 at 9:03 | comment | added | YCor | There's unfortunately no such list (on what could it be based? the journals' submission information is not public). The review time depends not only on the editorial board but on the referees; for a single journal at a given time the review time is highly variable. Another parameter: top journals are likely to ask short reports before the full process (more and more journal do this now). Also, needless to say, about defining "review time": the rejection time is in average shorter than acceptance time. So undoubtly the shortest review time is achieved by universalrejection.org | |
| Jan 27, 2022 at 8:53 | history | asked | StarLight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |