Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 26, 2022 at 17:29 comment added Denis Nardin @AndiBauer Yes, the (∞-)category of spectra is symmetric monoidal and there is a lax symmetric monoidal functor $H$ from abelian groups to spectra sending $A$ to $HA$ (the spectrum representing ordinary homology with coefficients in $A$). But giving the whole story of stable homotopy theory is going to be hard in the comment boxes :).
Jan 26, 2022 at 16:47 comment added Andi Bauer @DenisNardin: Stupid question again, but I thought $H\mathbb{Z}$ is a sequence of topological spaces. How does it define a ring, and how does it act on $H\mathbb{Z}_2$? Does $\mathbb{Z}_2$ being a $\mathbb{Z}$-module somehow lift to the corresponding Eilenberg-MacLane spectra?
Jan 26, 2022 at 16:19 comment added Denis Nardin @AndiBauer Every stable cohomology operation $H^*(-;\mathbb{Z}/2)\to H^{*+k}(-;\mathbb{Z}/2)$ is induced by a map of spectra $H\mathbb{Z}/2\to \Sigma^k H\mathbb{Z}/2$. If the cohomology operation comes from a natural transformation of chain complexes this map is $H\mathbb{Z}$-linear for the standard $H\mathbb{Z}$-module structure on the spectrum $H\mathbb{Z}/2$. However, it is known that $\operatorname{Sq}^i$ is not $H\mathbb{Z}$-linear for $i>1$.
Jan 26, 2022 at 15:47 comment added Andi Bauer @DenisNardin: Excuse the basic question, but by "$H\mathbb{Z}$-modules", do you mean the cohomology groups as $\mathbb{Z}$-modules? I'm a bit confused, I thought $Sq^i$ is a group homomorphism $H^k(X, \mathbb{Z_2})\rightarrow H^{k+i}(X, \mathbb{Z_2})$, and a group homomorphism is also a homomorphism of the corresponding $\mathbb{Z}$-modules?
Jan 21, 2022 at 12:37 comment added Denis Nardin I am skeptical such a thing can exist. It is known that $\operatorname{Sq}^i$ is not a map of $H\mathbb{Z}$-modules for $i>1$, and this precludes it being given by a map of chain complexes. I guess there could be a non-additive map that commutes with the differential, but it feels unnatural...
Jan 21, 2022 at 9:56 history edited Andi Bauer CC BY-SA 4.0
typo x instead of A; edited body
Jan 21, 2022 at 9:12 comment added Andi Bauer @TimCampion Thanks for the references! The second one explictly says they are using the original definitions via higher cup products. The first one sounds a bit like they are not considering different formulas for $p=2$ but only extending them to $p\neq 2$, but I'll have a closer look.
Jan 20, 2022 at 23:23 comment added Tim Campion I'm not sure whether they achieve your precise conditions, but some of Anibal Medina and collaborators' work may be relevant, including this and this.
Jan 20, 2022 at 23:16 history asked Andi Bauer CC BY-SA 4.0