Timeline for Why are local systems on a complex analytic space equivalent to vector bundles with flat connection?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S May 5, 2016 at 11:16 | history | suggested | ಠ_ಠ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Used tex to make it easier to read
|
May 5, 2016 at 11:04 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 5, 2016 at 11:16 | |||||
Nov 4, 2009 at 21:13 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev |
And don't forget to check the category axioms as well as \oplus and \otimes !
|
|
Nov 4, 2009 at 21:12 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | Depends on your definition of vector bundles. The construction is given, to show that it works, generally you should be able to prove this directly from definitions. | |
Nov 4, 2009 at 20:23 | comment | added | Ketil Tveiten | Is there a more explicit way to show E and O_X \otimes ker(D) isomorphic besides 'they have the same transition functions'? I feel like there ought to be an obvious map, but I can't come up with one that works. | |
Nov 4, 2009 at 20:06 | history | answered | shenghao | CC BY-SA 2.5 |