Timeline for Is the Čech–Stone compactification of the integers always a retract of an extremally disconnected space?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 17, 2022 at 17:08 | comment | added | Hua Wang | $\beta \mathbb{N}$ is the spectrum of the abelian $W^*$-algebra $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{N})$, so it is a hyperstonean space, in particular, itself is already stonean, i.e. extremally disconnected and compact. See, e.g. section III.1 of Takesaki's book on operator algebras. | |
Jan 17, 2022 at 16:43 | vote | accept | Tomasz Kania | ||
Jan 17, 2022 at 16:43 | comment | added | YCor | Could you define "absolute retract"? I guess it means "is a retract of any space in which it is embedded homeomorphically" but what kind of spaces are allowed? In any case, if $A$ is a free Boolean algebra with a surjective homomorphism onto $2^\omega$, this induces an embedding $\beta\omega\to X$ which is not split (i.e. $2^\omega$ is not a retract in $X$). So $2^\omega$ is not an absolute retract within Stone spaces. | |
Jan 17, 2022 at 16:42 | answer | added | KP Hart | timeline score: 3 | |
Jan 17, 2022 at 16:09 | history | asked | Tomasz Kania | CC BY-SA 4.0 |